WATER PRODUCTION FUNCTION AND MATHEMATICAL OPTIMIZATION OF REGULATED DEFICIT DRIP IRRIGATED PEACH

Ismail, S. M.; Omara, A. I.; El-Ansary, D. O.; Hamada, V.

doi:10.21608/mjae.2015.98193

WATER PRODUCTION FUNCTION AND MATHEMATICAL OPTIMIZATION OF REGULATED DEFICIT DRIP IRRIGATED PEACH

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Prof. of irrigation systems, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag. (EL-Shatby), Alexandria Univ., Egypt.

² Lecturer of irrigation systems, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag. (EL-Shatby), Alexandria Univ., Egypt.

³ Lecturer of Pomology, Precision Ag. Lab., Fac. of Ag. (EL-Shatby), Alexandria Univ., Egypt.

⁴ Graduate Student, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag. (EL-Shatby), Alexandria Univ.,Egypt.

10.21608/mjae.2015.98193

Abstract

Egypt is one of the countries facing great challenges due to its limited water resources associated with expanding population. Therefore, new approaches for irrigation management are required to reduce water consumption and improve water use efficiency. Regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) is the strategy of reducing irrigation rates during a specific period of growth and development, with the objective of conserving water and managing plant growth while maintaining or improving yield and fruit quality. A two years old Peach trees in sandy soil under drip irrigation system were subjected to a range of irrigation deficits from pit hardening to harvest during the 2011 and 2012 seasons to evaluate the effects of deficit irrigation on peach yield. Four irrigation treatments were evaluated according to irrigation water requirements: 120% of full irrigation (I₁₂₀), 100% full irrigation (I₁₀₀), 80% full irrigation (I₈₀), 60% full irrigation (I₆₀).A cost-benefit analysis was performed for two and three years old peach plantation [prunuspersica]to determine profitability under regulated deficit irrigation (RDI). The opportunity cost of water is higher than the delivery cost of water. One major point of this analysis is the dramatic differences between the delivery cost of water and its opportunity cost which is almost 10 times more than the delivery cost. It is clear that such a cost ought to be considered as the value of water. Regression equations were developed to predict crop yield resulting from water deficit. The study recommended the model to predict crop yield and water saving. As long as the main goal is to maximize the profit as well as saving water, it could be said that the optimal profitable yield is not necessarily the maximum one, but could be less. Deficit irrigation technique is recommended in arid regions such as Egypt where water resources are limited.

Keywords

References

Angele, G. (2012). SPSS Statistics 20. EineEinführung, Otto-Friedrich-Universität.‏

E. A. S. 2008. Economic Affairs Sector, Ministry of Agric. and Land reclamation, A.R.E.

Englsih, M.J., Music, J.T., Murty, V.V.N., 1990. Deficit irrigation. In: Hoffman, G.J., Howell, T.A., Solomon, K.H. (Eds.), Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE Monograph, Michigan, pp. 631–663.

Girona J, Mata M, Arbone´s A, Alegre S, Rufat J, Marsal J (2003) Peach tree response to single and combined regulated deficit irrigation regimes under shallow soils. J Am SocHorticSci 128:432–440.

Goldhamer DA, Viveros M, Salinas M (2006) Regulated deficit irrigation in almonds: effects of variations in applied water and stress timing on yield and yield components. IrrigSci 24:101–114.

Hess, A. 1996.A microcomputer scheduling program for supplementary irrigation.In:Irrigation Scheduling: From Theory to Practice, Proceedings ICID/FAO Workshop, Sept. 1995, Rome. Water Report No. 8, FAO, Rome.

Hillel D and Guron Y (1975). Relation between evapotranspiration rate and maize yield. Water Res., 9: 743-748.

Ismail, S.M. 1993 a. (1413 A.H.). Optimal irrigation and wheat yield response to applied water. J. King Saud Univ., Vol.5, Agric. Sci. (1),pp.41-56.

Ismail, S.M. 1993 b. Sprinkler-irrigated wheat production function and mathematical optimization. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 38(3):51-69.

Ismail, S.M., T.K. Zin El-abedin, D. El-Ansary, and A. Abdel-Al, 2015.Modification of FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water for Peach Trees.Misr J. Ag. Eng., 32(1): 145 – 172.

Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden DJ. 2003. Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. Wallingford,UK: CABI, IWMI.

Mitchell, P.D. & Chalmers, D.J. 1982.The effect of reduced water supply on peach tree growth and yields. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 107:853-856.

Mitchell, P.D., van den Ende, B., Jerie, P.H. and Chalmers, D.J. 1989. Response of “Bartlett” pear to witholding irrigation, regulated deficit irrigation, and tree spacing. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 114: 15-19.

Mitchell, P.D.., Jerie P.H., Chalmers, D.J. 1984. Effects of regulated water deficits on pear tree growth, flowering,fruit growth and yield. J Am SocHorticSci 109,604-606.

Naor A, Stern R, Peres M, Greenblat Y, Gal Y, Flaishman MA (2005) Timing and severity of postharvest water stress affect followingyear productivity and fruit quality of field-grown ‘Snow Queen’ nectarine. J Am SocHorticSci 130:806–812.

Przybyla, C. 1996. Irrigation scheduling in large-scale sprinkler irrigation in the Wielkopolska region (Poland). In: Irrigation Scheduling: From Theory to Practice, Proceedings ICID/FAO Workshop, Sept. 1995, Rome. Water Report No. 8, FAO, Rome.

Ruiz-Sa´nchez MC, Egea J, Galego R, Torrecillas A (1999) Floral biology of Bu´lida apricot trees subjected to postharvest drought stress. Ann ApplBiol 135:523–528.

Timothy D. Hewitt . (1982). AN ENTERPRISE COST ANALYSIS OF PEACH PRODUCTION IN FLORIDA1. Proc. Fla. Slate Hort. Soc, 95:98-101.