ASABE (2006b). Agricultural Machinery Management Data. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASAE D497.5 FEB2006).
Witney B (1995). Choosing and using farm machines. Land Technology Ltd., Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Lund M (1996). Mekanisering i ekologiskt lantbruk. En Genomg (ang av problemen och for slag till lo sningar. [Mechanisation in organic farming. A review of problems and suggestions on solutions.] Norsk senter for o¨ kologisk landbruk, Tingvoll Gard, Norway
De Toro A., A. (2004). Assessment of Field Machinery Performance in Variable Weather Conditions Using Discrete Event Simulation. Diss. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala.
De Toro A; Hansson P-A (2004a). Machinery co-operatives-a case study in Sweden. Biosystems Engineering, 87(1), 13–25.
Gunnarsson, C. (2008). Timeliness Costs in Grain and Forage Production Systems. Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Soerensen, C.G. (2003). Workability and Machinery Sizing for Combine Harvesting. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development. Manuscript PM 03 003 Vol V.
Srivastava, A.K., Goering, C.E., Rohrbach, R.P. & Buckmaster, D.R. (2006). Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines. 2nd edition. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Nilsson, B. (1987). Planering av arbets- och maskinsystem- resultat och erfarenheter. Uppsala: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (Institutionsmed de lande 87:03).
De Toro A., A. & Hansson, P.-A. (2004b). Analysis of field machinery performance based on daily soil workability status using discrete event simulation or on average workday probability. Agricultural Systems 79, 109-129.
Witney, B. (1995). Choosing and Using Farm Machines. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: Land Technology Ltd.
)
View on SCiNiTO