DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL AID TOOLS FOR MANGO FRUITS HARVESTING

El-Iraqi, M.E.; Sharibim, Y.; El Khawaga, S.E.

doi:10.21608/mjae.2010.105083

DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL AID TOOLS FOR MANGO FRUITS HARVESTING

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Senior Researcher, Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Egypt.

² Head of Research, and Chief of Machinery Design Dept., Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Egypt.

10.21608/mjae.2010.105083

Abstract

The main objective of the present study is to design and fabricate simple, low cost and portable mechanical harvesting aid of mango fruits for fresh marketing and exporting that assure having fair fruit quality with minimal twig height, and maximizing manual labor productivity in order to minimize the cost of manual picking. Therefore, four designed prototypes of mechanical harvesting aid tools namely mechanical disk cutter, electrical disk cutter, electrical scissors and cutting edge hook were designed and locally fabricated at some private workshops. The harvesting tools under study were evaluated and tested for harvesting Zebda and Hindi mango fruit varieties (mangifera indicia L.) using three different picking labors for each harvesting tool. The obtained results allow us to drawn the following conclusions:

The labor productivity increased by about 430.8, 240.1, 229.4 and 50.7 % for harvesting Zebda mango fruits and about 401.9, 215.2, 190.1 and 55.5% during harvesting Hindi mango fruits by using the mechanical disk cutter, electrical scissors, electrical disk cutter and cutting edge hook instead of using traditional stalk hook, respectively.
The lowest injured fruit percentage (3-4 and 3-4%) were obtained by using electrical scissors followed by electrical disk cutter (3-4 and 4-5%), then mechanical disk cutter (5-6 and 4-5%) for harvesting Zebda and Hindi mango fruits varieties, respectively. However, the highest values of validity period were 6-7 days and 8-9 days for harvesting Zebda and Hindi mango fruits varieties, respectively by using any of mechanical disk cutter, electrical scissors and electrical disk cutter.

Main Subjects

Agricultural Power and Machinery Engineering

References

Abu-Goukh, A. A. and H. I. Mohamed (2004) Effect of harvesting method on quality and shelf-life of mango fruits. Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, PO Box 321, Khartoum North, Sudan

AOAD (2009). Arab Agricultural Statistics Yearbook – VOL. No. (29), Khartoum, (http://www.aoad.org).

Jarimopas, B. and S. Pataweerat (1993). Evaluation of mango harvesting methods at Nakhon Pathom. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci. Suppl.) Vol., : 27, 94-100, Thailand.

Kitinoja, L. and A. A. Kader (2002). Small-Scale Postharvest Handling Practices: A Manual for Horticultural Crops (4th Edition) Postharvest Horticulture Series No. 8A. University of California, Davis, Postharvest Technology Research and Information Center.

Mukherjee, K. (1996). Introduction: Botany and importance. In: Litz R.E. the mango. Botany, production and uses, CAB international. Wallingford oxonoxio 8DE UK.7-17.

Pataweerat, S. (1989). Farm machinery in fruit harvesting. Paper presented for training course in Technology for high quality fruit production. Chantaburi Horticultural Research Center. Horticultural Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Chantaburi pp. 74-95.

Pataweerat,. T. Kakanakup, P. Montviset and A. Terdwongvorakul (1990). Design and development of fruit harvesting tools. Research report. Division of Agricultural Engineering. Department of Agriculture, Bangkok. 44 p.

Peterson, D.L. and S.S. Miller (1988). Advances in mechanical harvesting of fresh market quality apples. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 42:43-50

Ryall, A.L. and W.T. Pentzer (1982). Handling, Transportation and Storage of fruit and Vegetable.2nded.,AvI Publ. Co. Inc., Westport, Connecticut. 610 p.

Weor, D.U (2007). Effects of Various Harvesting Methods and Storage Environments on the Storability of Peter Mango Fruits in Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria. J. of Sustainable Development in Agriculture & Environment Vol. 3:81-88 Sept. 2007 ISSN 0794-8867©Paraclete Publishers.