EVALUATATING THE APPLICATION OF SURFACE AND SUB-SURFACE TRICKLE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR PLANTING ACTIVE PEAS IN SANDY SOIL

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Prof., Water management research institute, NWRC, Egypt.

2 Researcher, Water management research institute, NWRC, Egypt.

Abstract

The current study investigates two modern irrigation systems, (i.e. surface and sub-surface trickle irrigation systems). It was applied in Wadi El-Natron Experimental Station, which represents the new lands condition and it was applied on active pea crop. Three different emitter’s discharges equal to 2, 4 and 8 l/h and two irrigation systems were evaluated based on six indicators, (i.e. yield, water application, water consumption, water use efficiency, soil moisture and salt patterns). Both investigated systems were tested under two conditions (i.e. 100% and 50% of the net crop water requirements). The results indicated a privilege for using sub-surface trickle irrigation system (i.e. according to the different indicators). The sub-surface trickle irrigation system had higher yield, higher Water Use Efficiency, lower water application and water consumption compared to surface trickle irrigation when 100% of the net crop water requirements and 4 l/h emitter discharge were used. Also, this system gave sufficient available water and best distribution of moisture in the root zone. It was thus recommended to use the above conditions, under sandy soil, to achieve the lowest water application, water consumption, highest crop yield and water use efficiency.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abou El Azem, A. M.; T. M. Husien and A. A. Nassar (2002). Subsurface trickle system management for vegetable production. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci.; 17 (12): 425- 448.
Ahou EL Azem. A.M. and A. T. Abdel Aal (2009). Interaction between water applied and nitrogen fertilizer on yield of tomato. Water Science, Scientific Journal of the National Water Research Center, Issue No. 45: 89-104.
Assouline, S. (2002). The effects of micro drip and congenital drip irrigation on water distribution and uptake. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66: 1630-1636.
Black, C. A. ( 1965). Methods of soil analysis . Amer. Soc. Of Agron. Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, U. S. A.
Doorenbos, J. and A. H. Kassam (1979). Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33, Rome.
Doorenbos, J. and W.O. Pruitt (1977).Crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24 FAO, Rome, Italy.
El Berry, A. M. (1989). Design and utilization of subsurface drip irrigation system for fodder production in arid lands. Misr, J. of Agric. Eng. Egypt, 6 (2): 153-165.
El Berry, A. M.; E. Haffar and  M. H. Ahmed (1990). Utilization of Bi-Wall subsurface drip irrigation system for vegetable production under desert conditions. Misr, J. of Agric. Eng. Egypt, 7 (1): 17-23.
El Mansi, A. A.; H. M. E., Arisha; A. Bardisi and E. M. Nour (1999). Studies on some factors affecting growth and yield of pea under some soil conditions using drip irrigation system. 1- effect of sowing date and irrigation water quality. Zagazig, J. Agric. Res., 26, (5): 1385-1407.
Garcia, I. (1978). Soil water laboratory Manual. Dept. Agric. And ChemicalEngineering. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.
Israelsen, O. W. and V. E. Hansen, (1962).Irrigation principles and practices 3rd Edit., John Willey and Sons Inc., New York.
Jensen, M.E. (1983). Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. Amr. Soc. Agric. Eng. Michigan, U.S.A.
Martinaz Hemandz, J. J.; Bar – Yosef and U. Kafakafi (1991). Effect of surface and subsurface drip fertilization on sweet corn rooting uptake, dry matter production and yield. Irrigation Sci., 12 (3): 153-159.
Shalhevet, J. (1994). Using water of marginal quality for crop production: major issues – review article. Agricultural Water Management 25: 233- 269.
Snedecor, G. W. and W.G. Cochran (1980).Statistical methods. 7th Iowa Univ., Press, Amer., Iowa, U.S.A.
Vermeiren and Jobling (1980). Localized Irrigation, Irrigation & Drainage Paper No. 36, FAO, Rome.