ASSESSMENT OF DERMAL PESTICIDE EXPOSURE INSIDE GREENHOUSES USING FLUORESCENT TRACER METHOD

Younis, S. M.; Abdelbary, K. M.; Metawe, M. S. M.

doi:10.21608/mjae.2014.99667

ASSESSMENT OF DERMAL PESTICIDE EXPOSURE INSIDE GREENHOUSES USING FLUORESCENT TRACER METHOD

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt.

² Assist. Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt.

³ M. Sc. Student, Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt.

10.21608/mjae.2014.99667

Abstract

The main object of the search work is to assess the dermal pesticide exposure inside greenhouses during its application and to compare pesticide pollution resulted from handgun sprayer with its values of a vertical boom sprayer prototype. Fluorescent tracer, is semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment method based on visual observations of fluorescence images, had been used to demonstrate the extent to which dermal exposure can occur under inadequate protective conditions. 22 body segments (˃ 90% of the total body surface area) scored for all workers. Prototype is superior to handgun sprayer, contaminated area ratio of glasses was 0.28% - no pollution for the mask versus 8.11% and 9.15% respectively. Trunk, buttock, chest and shoulder contaminated area with handgun sprayer were 1.75, 1.60, 0.60 and 6.69 % (front view) and were 1.79, 9.51, 0.73 and 0.00 at back view versus no pollution (0.00 %) in all previous cases with vertical boom sprayer prototype. No pollution in any area of worker’s arms compared to polluted area ranged between 0.00 and 8.17% for handgun sprayer. Contaminated area of gloves (5% of total body area) ranged between 0.00 and 0.92 % for vertical spray boom prototype versus 11.72 % - 19.50 % for handgun sprayer. Worker’s legs exposed to some pollution (0.42 % and 0.82%) against more detected exposure extended to 13.36 % for handgun sprayer. Regrettably, workers did not wear safety boots, though no data for feet area, which form about 7 % of total body area, was taken. Tested prototype maintained more working safety conditions when compared to handgun sprayer.

Keywords

References

Aragón, A., L. E. Blanco, A. Funez, C. Ruepert, C. Lidén, G. Nise and C. Wesseling. (2006). Assessment of dermal pesticide exposure with fluorescent tracer: a modification of a visual scoring system for developing countries. British Occupational Hygiene Society. The Annuals of occupational hygiene. Vol., 50(1):75–83. Oxford University Press.

Archibald B.A., K. R. Solomon and G. R. Stephenson GR. (1995). Estimation of pesticide exposure to greenhouse applicators using video imaging and other assessment techniques. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal;56(3):226-235.

Barber, J.A.S., C.S. Parkin. (2003). Fluorescent tracer techniques for measuring the quantity of pesticide deposited to soil following soil application. Crop Prot. 22: 14–21.

Boeniger, M. F. (2003). The significance of skin exposure. Annotated Occupational Hygiene. 47(8):591-603.

Bozdogan, N. Y. and A. M. Bozdogan. (2009). Assessment of dermal bystander exposure in pesticide applications using different. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. Vol.7 (2): 678-682.

Braekman, P. and B. Sonck. (2008). A review of the current spray applications techniques in various ornamental plant production systems in Flanders, Belgium. International Advances in Pesticide Application, Robinson College, Cambridge, UK, 9-11.pp: 303-308.

Cherrie, J. W., D. H. Brouwer, M. Roff, R. Vermeulen and H.Kromhout, H. (2000). Use of qualitative and quantitative Fluorescence techniques to assess dermal exposure. British Occupational Hygiene Society. The Annuals of occupational hygiene. Vol., 44(7): :519–522. Elsevier Science Ltd.

Chester, G. (1993). Evaluation of agricultural worker exposure to, and absorption of, pesticides. Annotated Occupational Hygiene. 37(5):509-523.

Durham W.F. and H. R. Wolfe. (1962). Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides. World Health Organization Bulletin. 26:75-91.

Evans, P.G., J. J. McAlinden and P. Griffin P. ( 2001). Personal protective equipment and dermal exposure. Journal Applied occupational and Environmental Hygiene. Vol. 16 (2) :334–337.

Fenske, R. A. (1993). Dermal exposure assessment techniques. Annotated Occupational Hygiene. 37(6):687-706.

Fenske, R. A., L. Chensheng, C. L. ynthia, J. H. Shirai and J. C. Kissel. (2005). Biologic monitoring to characterize organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children and workers: An analysis of recent studies in Washington State. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(11), 1651–1657.

Fishel, F. M. (2011). Exposing pesticide exposure using fluorescent tracer.The Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

Fritz, B. K., W. C. Hoffmann and P. Jank. (2011). A fluorescent tracer method for evaluating spray transport and fate of field and laboratory spray applications. Journal of ASTM International, 8(3), Paper ID JAI103619. Available online at www.astm.org

Giannandrea, F., L. Settimi and I. F. Talamanca, (2008). The use of personal protective equipment in pregnant greenhouse workers. Society of Occupational Medicine. Oxford University Press, (England), Vol. 58 (1): 52–57.

Machera, K. , M. Goumenou, E. Kapetanakis, A. Kalamarakis and R. C. Glass. (2003). Determination of potential dermal and inhalation operator exposure to malathion in greenhouses with the whole body dosimetry method. The Annual of Occupational Hygiene. Vol. 47 (1) : 61–70.

Machera, K., E. Kapetanakis, A. Charistou, E. Goumenaki and R. C. Glass. (2002). Evaluation of potential dermal exposure of pesticide spray operators in greenhouses by use of visible tracers. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, Pesticide, Food contaminated and agricultural wastes. 37:113–121.

MacIntyre-Allen, J. K., J. H. Tolman, C. D. Scott-Dupree and C. R. Harris. (2007). Confirmation by fluorescent tracer of coverage of onion leaves for control of onion thrips using selected nozzles, surfactants and spray volumes. Crop Protection. 26(11), 1625–1633.

Nuyttens, D., P. Braekman, S.Windey and B.Sonck. (2009). Potential dermal pesticide exposure affectedby greenhouse spray application technique. Pest Manag Sci. Vol. 65: 781–790.

OSHA. (2003). Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. 20210. www.OSHA.gov

Schleier, J. J., C. Preftakes, and R. K. D Peterson. (2010). The effect of fluorescent tracers on droplet spectrum, viscosity, and density of pesticide formulations. Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes, 45(7), 621–625.

Soutar, A., S. Semple, R. J. Aitken and A. Robertson. (2000). Use of patches and whole body sampling for the assessments of dermal exposure. Annuals of Occupational Hygiene. Vol., 44 (7) :511–518 (2000).

Vidal, J. L. M., F. J. E.Gonzalez, A. G. Frenich, M. M. Galera, P. A. Aguilera and El. Carrique. (2002). Assessment of relevant factors and relationships concerning human dermal exposure to pesticides in greenhouse applications. Pest Manag Sci. Vol.: 58:784–790.

Wendel de Joode, B. V., R Vermeulen, J. J. van Hemmen, W. Fransman and H. Kromhout. (2005). Accuracy of a semiquantitative method for dermal exposure assessment (DREAM). Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Vol., 62(9): 623–632.