EFFECT OF MULCHING AND EMITTER SPACING ON WATER USE EFFICIENCY AND YIELD OF SQUASH

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Assist. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Ag., Cairo Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

Influences of two plastic mulch practices (transparence and black mulching) using trickle irrigation and three emitter spacings (35, 50 and 65 cm) on squash yield, soil water availability and WUE were assessed using experimental plots. In comparison to trickle irrigation and conventional surface irrigation, the transparence and black mulching significantly increased squash fruit yield, soil moisture storage (0–60 cm) and WUE. Results indicated that non-mulched treatments (trickle irrigation, DI, at emitter spacings 35, 50 and 65 cm and surface irrigation, SI, received an average of 328.5 mm for first three treatments and 698.6 mm for forth treatment, respectively to produce 21.754, 18.989, 17.336 and 16.054 t/ha squash, respectively, whereas treatments with transparent and black plastic mulching (TMD and BMD) consumed an average of 286.6 mm and 299.2 mm water for all emitter spacings (35, 50 and 65 cm), respectively, and yielded average of 33.445, 31.067, 22.816, 33.338, 29.065 and 25.434 t/ha, respectively at same emitter spacings.

Keywords


Allen, R.G.; L.S. Pereira; D. Raes and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO I. and Drain. Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 300.
Darwish, T.; T. Atallah; M. Hajhasan and S. Chranek. 2003. Management of nitrogen by fertigation of potato in Lebanon. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 67, 1–11.
Ells, J.E.; A. E. McSay; E. G. Kruse and G. Larson. 1994. Root distribution and proliferation of field grown acorn squash as influenced by plastic mulch and water. Hort. Technol. 4, 248–252.
Ertek, A., S. Sensoy; I. Gedik and K. C. Küc¸ ükyumuk. 2006. Irrigation scheduling based cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field condition. Agricultural Water Management 81 (1–2), 159–172.
Farias-Larios, J.; S. Guzman and A. C. Michel. 1994. Effect of plastic mulches on the growth and yield of cucumber in a tropical region. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 10 (4), 303–306.
FAO  2010.  Food  and  Agriculture  Organization  of  the  United  Nations. http://www.faostat.fao.org. 16Aug. 2012.
Fisher, P.D. 1995. An alternative plastic mulching system for improved water management in dry land maize production. Agric. Water Manage. 27, 155–166.
Gajri, P.R.; V. K. Arora and M. R. Chaudhary. 1994. Maize growth, response to deep tillage, straw mulching and farmyard manure in coarse textured soils of N.W. India. Soil Use and Management 10, 15–20.
Ham, J.M.; G. J. Kluitenberg and W. J. Lamont. 1993. Optical properties of plastic mulches affect the field temperature regime. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences 228 (2), 188–193.
Hatfield, J. L.; T. J. Sauer and J. T. Prueger. 2001. Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review. Agron. J. 93, 271–280.
Janat, M. 2003. Effect of drip fertigation on improvement of potato yield and water use efficiency. In: AECS -A/RRE, 126., pp. 1–38.
Khurshid, K.; M. Iqbal; M. S. Arif and A. Nawaz. 2006. Effect of tillage and mulch on soil physical properties and growth of maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology (5), 593–596.
Kirnak, H. and N. M. Demirtas. 2006. Effect of different mulches on yield and macronutrition levels of drip – irrigation cucumber via open field conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29 (9), 1675–1690.
Kouwenhoven, J.K.; U. D. Perdok, J. Boer and G. J. M. Oomen. 2002. Soil management byshallow mouldboard ploughing in the Netherlands. Soil Till. Res. 65, 125–139.
Lamont, W.J. 2005. Plastics: modifying the microclimate for the production of vegetable crops. HortTechnology 15, 477–481.
Liakatas, A.; J. A. Clark and J. L. Monteith. 1986. Measurements of the heat balance under plastic mulches. Part I. Radiation balance and soil heat flux. Agriculture for Meteorology 36, 227–239.
Lovelli, S.; M. Perniola; A. Ferrara and T. Di Tommaso. 2007. Yield  response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric. Water Manage. 92,  73–80
Mohler, C. H. L. and M. B. Callaway. 1995. Effects of tillage and mulch on weed seedproduction and seed banks in sweet corn. J. Appl. Ecol. 32, 627–639.
Mustafa, O. S.; I. M. Arshad and S. A. Sattar. 2003. Adoption of kostiakof model to determine the soil infiltration for surface irrigation methods under local conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 1, 40–42.
Ngouajio, M. and J. Ernest. 2005. Changes in the physical, optical, and thermal properties of polyethylene mulches during double cropping. Hortscience 40, 94–97.
Ngouajio, M.; G. Wanga and R. Goldy. 2006. With holding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agricultural Water Management 87 (3), 285–291, Available at: Science Direct.
Raina, J. N.; B. C. Thakur; M. L. Verma. 1999. Effect of drip irrigation and polyethylene mulch on yield, quality and water-use efficiency of tomato. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 60 (6), 430–433.
Ramalan, A. A. and C. U. Nwokeocha. 2000. Effects of furrow irrigation methods,mulching and soil water suction on the growth, yield and water use efficiency of tomato in the Nigerian Savanna. Agric. Water Manage. 45 (3),317–330.
Oweis, D. 2012. On-farm Water Management: from efficiency to productivity. In: Training Course on Improving Water Productivity in Agricultural Systems, Amman, Jordan (NCARE) May 6th to May 24th, IWLMP-ICARDA.
Pawar, D. D.; P. G. Bhoi and S. H. Shinde. 2002. Effect of irrigation methods and fertilizer levels on yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 72 (2), 80–83.
Saif, U.; M. Maqsood; M. Farooq; S. Hussain and A. Habib. 2003. Effect of planting patterns and different irrigation levels on yield and yield component of maize (Zea mays, L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 1, 64–66.
Seyfi, K. and M. Rashidi. 2007. Effect of drip irrigation and plastic mulch on crop yield and yield components of Cantaloupe. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 9 (2), 247–249.
Simonne, E.H. and M. D. Dukes. 2010. Principles and Practices of Irrigation Management for Vegetables. UF, University of Florida, Horticulture Science Dept, IFAS Extension, pp. 17–23.
Singh, S.; A. Singh; V. P. Singh; S. Singh and A. Singh. 1999. Use of dust mulch and antitransparent for improving water use efficiency of menthol mint. J. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci. 21 (1), 29–33.
Steyn, J.M.; H.F. Plessis; P. Fourier; and T. Roos. 2000. Irrigation scheduling of drip irrigated potatoes. In: Proceeding of 6th International Micro-irrigation Congress, Micro-irrigation Technology for Developing Agriculture, South Africa, 22–27 October.
Thiagalingam, K.; N. P. Dalgliesh; N. S. Gould; R. L. McCown; A. L. Cogle and A. L. Chapman, , 1996. Comparison of no-till and conventional tillage in the developmentof sustainable farming systems in the semi-arid tropics. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36,995–1002.
Verma, M. L. and C. L. Acharya. 1996. Waster stress indices of wheat in relation to soil water conservation practices and nitrogen. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 44 (3), 368–375.
Weber, C. 2000. Biodegradable foil mulch for pickling cucumbers. Gemuse Munchen 36 (4), 30–32.
Wien, H. C.; P. L. Minotti and V. P. Grubinger. 1993. Polyethylene mulch stimulates early root growth and nutrient uptake of transplanted tomatoes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 118 (2), 207–211.
Yaghi, T.; A. Arslan and F. Naoum. 2013. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus, L.) water use efficiency (WUE) under plastic mulch and drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 128: 149– 157.
Zaman, W.U.; M. Arshad and A. Saleem. 2001. Distribution of nitrate nitrogen in the soil profile under different irrigation methods. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2, 208–209.
Zotarelli, L.; J.M. Scholberg; M.D.Dukes; R. Munoz-Carpena and J. Icerman. 2009.Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rat and irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management 96 (1), 23–34.