EFFECT OF NATURAL LIGHTING, COMBINATION OF SOAKING AND IRRIGATION, AND SEEDING RATE ON BARLEY GREEN FODDER PRODUCTION UNDER FARMER'S DOMESTIC ROOM CONDITIONS

Elsoury, Hussien A.; Aboukarima, Abdulwahed M.; Bayomi, Magdy I.

doi:10.21608/mjae.2015.98722

EFFECT OF NATURAL LIGHTING, COMBINATION OF SOAKING AND IRRIGATION, AND SEEDING RATE ON BARLEY GREEN FODDER PRODUCTION UNDER FARMER'S DOMESTIC ROOM CONDITIONS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Researcher, Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Centre, Egypt.

² Senior Res., Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Centre, Egypt.

³ Head of Research, Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Centre, Egypt.

10.21608/mjae.2015.98722

Abstract

The increasing competition between animal fodder and human food on the limited cropping in Egypt led to increasing prices of raw materials which are used in manufacturing fodder. On the other hand, there is an alternative method that can be used to produce low-cost fodder with fewer efforts, without any electric energy and with lower water consumption. This study was carried out to evaluate the sprouting process of barley grains under farmer's domestic room conditions. Effect of natural lighting, combination of soaking and irrigation and seeding rate (4.01, 5.50 and 6.47kg/m²) on the investigated variables (green fodder yield, plant height and conversion factor of seeds into green fodder) were studied. Average values of temperature, relative humidity and lighting intensity in the farmer's domestic room with natural illumination were 28.0°C, 72.8% and 147 lux, respectively. Meanwhile, average values of temperature, relative humidity and lighting intensity in the farmer's domestic room without natural illumination (dark room) were 27.7 °C, 73.8% and 0 lux, respectively. The average dimensions of the used barley grains were 9.8 mm length, 3.4 width and 2.7 mm thickness. The average final bulk density and weight of 1000 seeds of barley grains were 0.590 g/cm3 and 40.85 g, respectively. The average initial moisture content (dry basis) of the barley grains was 13.95 %. The results of this study showed that the conversion factor was about 5.81 times per kg of barley grains. The combination of soaking and irrigation and natural lighting treatments had significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) on green fodder yield.
In conclusion, local barley cultivar has an ability to produce green fodder under farmer's domestic room conditions with less water consumption; and no energy and no special equipment. These findings are considered very important as the framers could use any domestic room in their houses to produce green fodder using barley seeds which are mostly available in the local market in Egypt at low price

References

Abbas, T. A. A. (2009). Nutritional value of germinated wheat. Al- Mustansiriya J. Sci., 20(2):41-46.

Adel Eshtayeh, I. F. (2004). A new source of fresh green feed (hydroponic barley) for Awass sheep. Unpublished MSc. Theses in Environment Sciences, Faculty of Graduate Studies, at An- Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Al-Ajmi, A., A. Salih, I. Kadhim and Y. Othman (2009). Yield and water use efficiency of barley fodder produced under hydroponic system in GCC countries using tertiary treated sewage effluents. Journal of Phytology, 1(5): 342-348.

Al-Karaki, G. N. and N. Al-Momani (2011). Evaluation of some barley cultivars for green fodder production and water use efficiency under hydroponic conditions. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences,7(3):448-457.

Al-Karaki, G. N. (2008). Application of hydroponic culture in production of green fodder. Training workshop, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain 21-23 April, 2008.

Al-Karaki, G. N. (2010). Hydroponic green fodder: alternative method for saving water in dry areas. Proceedings of the "Second Agricultural Meeting on Sustainable Improvement of Agricultural and Animal Production and Saving Water Use, September 2010, Sultanate of Oman.

Al-Karaki, G. N. (2011). Utilization of treated sewage wastewater for green forage production in a hydroponic system. Emir. J. Food Agric.,23 (1): 80-94.

Al-Karaki, G. N. and M. Al-Hashimi(2012).Green fodder production and water use efficiency of some forage crops under hydroponic conditions. ISRN Agronomy, Volume 2012, Article ID 924672, 5 pages.

Anonymous,http://seednet.gov.in/Material/Handbook_of_seed_testing/Chapter%207.pdf

ASAE (1982). ASAE Standard (29th Edn.), S352_1. Moisture measurement-grain and seeds. St. Joseph, MI, USA.

Bull, R. C. and C. F. Peterson (1969). Nutritive value of sprouted wheat for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci., (Suppl.),28(6): 856.

Chavan, J. and S.S. Kadam (1989). Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting. Critical Reviews in food science and Nutrition, 28: 401- 437.

Chen, C. (2003). Evaluation of air oven moisture content determination methods for rough rice. Biosystems Engineering,86 (4):447–457.

Chung, T., E.N. Nwokolo and J.S. Sim (1989). Compositional and digestibility changes in sprouted barley and canola seeds. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 39: 67-278.

Cuddeford, D. (1989). Hydroponic grass. In Practice,11(5):211-214.

Dung, D.D., I.R. Godwin and J.V. Nolan (2010). Nutrient content in Sacco digestibility of barley grain and sprouted barley. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(19):2485-2492.

El-Deeba, M. M., M. N. El-Awady, M. M. Hegazi, F. A. Abdel-Azeem and M. M. El-Bourdiny (2009). Engineering factors affecting hydroponics grass- fodder production. The 16th. Annual Conference of the Misr Society of Ag. Eng., 25 July, 2009: 1647-1666.

El-Mouhamady, A. A., Kh. A. Amer and A.Y. Ragab (2012). Developmentof salinity tolerance in some genotypes of barley using line x tester analysis and some techniques of biotechnology.Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(2): 972-982.

Fayed, A. M. (2011). Comparative study and feed evaluation of sprouted barley grains on rice straw versus tamarix mannifera on performance of growing Barki lambs in Sinai. Journal of American Science, 7(1): 954-961.

Fazaeli, H., H. A. Golmohammadi, A. A. Shoayee, N. Montajebi and Sh. Mosharraf (2011). Performance of feedlot calves fed hydroponics fodder barley. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 13: 367-375.

Fazaeli, H., H.A. Golmohammadi, S.N. Tabatabayee and M. Asghari-Tabrizi (2012). Productivity and nutritive value of barley green fodder yield in hydroponic system. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16 (4): 531-539.

Goodwin, T.W. and E. I. Mercer (1993). Introduction to plant bio- chemistry. Second edition copyright, Pergamum press Ltd.

Hussein, E.H.A., M. A. Madkour, S. K. Assem and A. M.A. Radwan (2004).Embryogenic callus formation and plant regeneration from immature embryos of some barley genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.). Arab J. Biotech., 7 (1): 111-122.

Kruglyakov, Yu. A. (1989). Construction of equipment for growing green fodder by a hydroponic technique. Traktory-I Sel'skokhozyaistvennye Mashiny, 6: 24-27.

Massantini, F. and G. Magnani (1980). Hydroponic fodder growing: Use of cleaner-separated seed. Fifth International Congress on Soilless Culture.

Mohsenin, NN. (1980). Physical properties of plant and animal materials, New York: Gorden and Breach.

Morgan, J., R.R. Hunter and R. O'Haire (1992). Limiting factors in hydroponic barley grass production. 8th International congress on soil less culture, Hunter's Rest, South Africa, pp: 241-261.

Pandey, H.N. and N.N. Pathak (1991). Nutritional evaluation of artificially grown barley fodder in lactating crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 8(1): 77-78.

Peer, D.J. and S. Leeson (1985a). Feeding value of hydroponically sprouted barley for poultry and pigs. Animal Feed Sci. and Techn., 13: 183-190.

Peer, D.J. and S. Leeson (1985b). Nutrient content of hydroponically sprouted barley. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 13(3-4): 191-202.

SAS (1998). Statistical Analysis Systems. Version 6.11, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

Singh, K.K. and T.K. Goswam (1996). Physical properties of cumin seed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 64: 93–98.

Sneath, R. and F. McIntosh (2003). Review of hydroponic fodder production for beef cattle.Project number NBP.332, Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 993, Dalby QLD 4405, Meat & Livestock Australia Limited, Locked Bag 991, North Sydney NSW 2059.

Thomas, J.W. and B.S. Reddy (1962). Sprouted oats as a feed for dairy cows. Quarterly Bulletin of the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, 44:654-655.

Trubey, C. R., C. L. Rhykerd, C. H. Noller, D. R. Ford and J. R. George (1969). Effect of light, culture solution, and growth period on growth and chemical composition of hydroponically produced oat seedlings. Agronomy J., 61(5): 663-665.

Urbonavičiūtė, A., G. Samuolienė, S. Sakalauskienė, A. Brazaitytė, J. Jankauskienė, P. Duchovskis, V. Ruzgas, A. Stonkus, P. Vitta, A. Žukauskas and G. Tamulaitis (2009). Effect of flashing chamber light on the nutritional quality of green sprouts. Agronomy Research 7 (Special issue II), 761–767.