PROTOTYPE MACHINE TO MIX AND ADDING ANIMAL FEED

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Lec. Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. Agric. Mansoura Univ., Egypt.

2 Senior Researcher Agric. Eng. Res. Inst. Agric. Res. center , Egypt.

3 Assoc. Prof and chairman of Agric. Structures and environmental control Eng. Dept. Fac. of Agric., Al-Azhar Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

Small animal farms are currently adding and mixing of feed materials manually, which may cause wasting the amount of it. Transfer and delivery of the mixed animal feed to feedlots may be causes the difficulty of achieving distributed recommended ratios of feed mixing operation. Some of the interactions between the components may occur after leaving period which may cause rot and damage to the feed materials.  Grinded (concentrated) animal feed is difficult to add directly in the form of powder separately.  Preferably mixed them with roughage materials and adding feed materials blended automatically. To obtain the mentioned aim, locally manufactured machine achieved mixing and adding at the same time with recommended ratios obtaining a little bit losses of feed materials. To performance and evaluation of new machine, experimented in the animal farm at the three different tested factors. Four forward speeds (Fs1 = 1.2) & (Fs2 = 2.2) & (Fs3 = 3.1) & (Fs4 = 4.2) km/h., Four opening hopper gate ratios (roughage feed material gate : concentrated feed material gate) (G1 = 1:1) & (G2 = 1:2) & (G3 = 1:3) & (G4 = 1:4) and three Revolution ratios (Mixing auger revolution : stirring shaft revolution) ( R1 = 1:1 ) & ( R2 = 1:2 ) & ( R3 = 1:3 ). The animal feed adding rate as kg to one longitudinal meter of feedlot (kg/m), mixing quality of animal feed materials were measured. The obtained results showed that, the new machine works properly at lowest forward speed (Fs1 = 1.2 km/h) with deferent other treatments under study, but the optimal quantity of feed additives by machine 16 kg/m achieved with (R2 = 1:2), also new machine had highest efficiency of animal feed mixing process quality with all treatments under study specially with (G3 = 1:3) 

Bowman, J. G. P. and Sowell B. F. (1997), "Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants." A review J. Anim. Sci. 75 – 543.
Comerford, J. W.; Kime, L. F. and Harper, J. K. (2013), Agricultural Alternatives: Beef back grounding production. University Park: Penn State.
Galyean, M. L.; Macolm, K. J. and Garcia, D. R. (1992), "Effects of varying the pattern feed composition on performance by programmed fed beef steers. Clayton Livestock Res. Ctr. Prog. Rep. No. 78. N. M. Agric. Exp. Sta., Las Cruces.
Grover, P. D. and Mishra, S. K. (1996), Biomass briquetting: technology and practices. Regional wood energy development programmer in ASIA, gcp/ras/154/net. Food and agricultural organization of the united nations, Bangkok, April 1996. No. 46. 
Huston, J. E. (2000), "Frequency of feeding supplements to cattle." Proc. 2000 Plains Nutrition Council Fall Grazing Conference. P.18.
Jtaer (Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 2007). ISSN 0718-1876 Electronic Version. Vol. 2/ ISSUE 1/ April 2007/ 29 – 62
Nader, G.; Mutters, R.G. and Robinson, P. (2000). Rice straw utilization by cattle. Annual report, RU-3, comprehensive research on rice, University of California and USDA, Davis. CA.
Pond, W. G. and Church, D. C. (1995), Basic animal nutrition and feeding, 1995 pp. viii + 615 pp. ISBN 0-471-30864-1. Record number 19951412223, New York, U.S.A
Pulsipher, G. D. (2000), "Supplemental nutrients for beef cows and heifers consuming low-quality forages Ph.D. dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
Sharma, P. C. and Aggar-Wal,  D. K. (1987). Machine Design (Mechanical Engineering Design) in S.I Units S.K Kataria and Sons publishers and book Sellers, Delhi, India
Wand, C. (2014), "Nutrition and feeding systems for market lamb finishing." FACTSHEET 14-041 – AGDEX 430/61 – August 2014