USE OF MECHANISATION INDEX FOR ASSESSING LEVEL OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN SOME NEWLY RECLAIMED AGRICULTURAL FARMS

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Soil Conservation Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.

Abstract

The levels of agricultural mechanization at some farms on the new reclaimed areas of Nubaria in El Behira Governorate were measured and the productivity of each surveyed farms was analyzed. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree, level and capacity index of agricultural mechanization in the district and their relations with productivity. The results of the farm mechanization index revealed that the highest level of mechanization was 62.99% for the sugar beet area while the lowest mechanization index was 26.53% for West Nubaria area, while the total productivity ranged between 0.0115 ha/kW.h and 0.0557 ha/kW.h. The average crop yields on maize ranges between 1.2 to 1.7 Mg/ha and that of sugar beet ranges between 11 to 13 Mg/ha. The general analysis of the study indicated that high levels in agricultural mechanization policy, existence of favorable conditions for full integration of agricultural mechanization, enough essential infrastructure and financial credits among other variables explained the observed high scale of production (sugar beet area) and vice versa (west Nubaria area).

Keywords


Bakhshoodeh M. and Thomson K. (2001). Input and output technical efficiencies of wheat production in Kerman, Iran. Agricultural Economics 24, 307-313.
Chisango T. and  Dzama T. (2013). An assessment of agricultural mechanization index and evaluation  of agricultural productivity of some fast track resettlement farms in Bindura district of Mashonaland central province: Zimbabwe. International Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary Research. Vol. 2 (7) 62-82.
Deng X., Lou Y., Dong S. and Yang X. (2005). Impact of resources and technology on farm production in northwestern China. Agricultural Sys. J.  84,155-169.
Jhingan, M. (1997). Advance economic theory (Micro and Macro Economic). Macmilan Publisher, USA.
Karimi M., Rafiee S., Rajabi Pour A., Khairalipour K. and Shahin S. (2008). A pattern to distribute tractor power from the viewpoint of energy case study: Isfahan province in central region of Iran. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 3 (4): 526-531
Kepner, R., Bainer R. and Berger E. (1978). Principles of farm machinery 3rd Edition. AVI Publication Company Inc. Connect, Int. U.S.A.
Nowacki T. (1974). Example of technical economic analysis of mechanized process in various agro-technical conditions: Economic commission for Europe AGRI/MECH/32.
Olaoye, J. (2007). An evaluation of farm power and equipment ownership and management in Niger State, Nigeria. Nigerian J. of Tech. Development, 5 (1 & 2): 94 –102.
Ortiz C. and Salvador I. (1980). Effects of different mechanization levels in Spanish dryland farms. J. of Agri. Mech. in Asia, 3(5):31-36.
Ozpinar S. (2006). Effects of tillage systems on weed population and economics for winter wheat production under the Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil and Tillage Res. J. 87, 1–8.
Rahman S. and Hasan M. (2008). Impact of environmental production conditions on productivity and efficiency: A case study of wheat farmers in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management 88, 1495–1504.
Singh, G. (2006). Estimation of a mechanisation index and its impact on production and economic factors: A Case Study in India. Biosystems Engineering 93 (1), 99–106.
Tabatabaeefar, A. and Omid, M. (2005). Current status of Iranian agricultural mechanization. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences 1(2), 196-201.
http://www.agricultureegypt.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?CatID=13a8f2e4-51bc-49bf-820c-302787450640&ID=fe3f0858-97f2-4851-acc2-0493975177fb . (2011). تقریر احصائى عن المساحات الزراعیة بمدیریة زراعة النوباریة