PREDICTION OF MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAINS DURING RE-WETTING PROCESS FOR MILLING

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Senior Researcher, Agric. Eng. Res. Institute, Agric.Res.Center, Dokki, Egypt.

2 Head of Researchers, Agric. Eng. Res. Institute, Agric.Res.Center, Dokki, Egypt.

Abstract

The main objectives of the present research work were to study the effects of moisture content on some characteristics of grains, the method could be used by grain industry to sequence be have moisture content during re-wetting processing and to predict moisture content by calibration of electric resistance of grains to increase grain quality in order to minimize grain.Corn variety 10, Wheat variety Giza 168 and Rice variety Sakha 103 grains were used in the experiments as re-wetting process and measurements.Grains were with the initial moisture content of about 12.5% , 12% and 11% (b.d) for corn, wheat and rice grains.The grains were milled using hammer mill. The following most tmprtant results conclusions were found, 1) The suitable moisture content was 16, 15.5 and 16.5 % of corn, wheat and rice grains, respectively at about 1.5 h of re-wetting time. Which lead to increase weight of 1000 grains was 470, 43 and 26 g , and water absorbed of grains were 0.0279, 0.0023 and 0.0017g. Meanwhile, the electric resistance of grains was decreased, which were 35.95, 35.1 and 32.2 Omme and terminal velocity was 70.5, 45.9 and 28.9 m/s, and hardness of grains was decreased, which was 189, 37.5 and 24 N of corn, wheat and rice grains, respectively 2) By increasing the moisture content of corn, wheat and rice grains during re-wetting process. The weight and water absorbed were increased. Meanwhile, the hardness and electric resistance were decreased. 3) The correlation factor between the moisture content and electric resistancewas 0.98, 0.97 and 0.97 for corn, wheat and paddy rice grains during re-wetting process, respectively. That is mean the correlation factorwas ranged between r = 0.97 – 0.98 which is considered that the correlation relationship between the moisture content and electric resistance more significant and high.

4)Re-wetting process before the grinding lead to reduction percentage of consumption energy about 20 % of grains and 5) re-wetting of grains can be important for the milling process and softens the endosperm to increase flour extraction and reduces the power consumption during the milling process.

Main Subjects


Abd EL-Kader, M.N. (1995).Effect of different sources of flour on some bakery products.Rural Home Economic Department. M.Sc. Thesis. Fac. Of Agric. Cairo Univ. PP. : 4-29.
Bizzarri, O., and Morelli, A. (1988).Milling of durum wheat. In G. Fabriani, & C. Lintas (Eds.), Durum wheat: Chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA. Pp.:161-189.
Cnossen, A. G and T. J. Siebenmorgen. (2000). The glass transition temperature concept in rice drying and tempering: effect on milling quality. Rice Quality Workshop 2003 Trans. ASAE 43(6):1661-1667.
Connel, P., Lawrance, L., and Nelson, R. (2004). Durum wheat: Australia’s role in world markets. Australian Commodities, 11 (2): 319-324.
Dick, J. W., and Matsuo, R. R. (1988).Durum wheat and pasta products. In: Y. Pomeranz (Ed.), Wheat: chemistry and technology (3rd ed.). American Association of Cereal Chemists: St. Paul, MN, USA. Vol. II, pp. 507-547.
Doblado-Maldonado, A. F.; A. F. Rolando; and D. J. Rose (2013).Low moisture milling of wheat for quality testing of wholegrain flour.University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.Journal of Cereal Science. Pp.: 1-4
Donnelly, B. J. and J. G. Ponte (2000). Pasta: Raw materials and processing. In K. Kulp& J. G. Ponte (Eds.), Handbook of cereal science and technology (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker, Inc. U. S. A. Pp.: 647-665.
El-Raie, A.E.S. (1987). Properties of shelled corn related to mechanical separation. Misr. J. Ag. Eng., 4 (1) : 36-52.
Hashemi, J.; A. Borghei; N. Shimizu and T. Kimura (2005).“Optimization of final Moisture content of paddy in flat bed dryer with consideration of minimum losses and marketability in Iran” and Natural Reso.ofKhazar, 3(2), 72-82.
Hashemi, J.;1R. Tabatabaekoloor and T. Kimura (2009). Effects of discharge fan on the drying efficiency in flat-bed type dryer.  Proc. world acad. sci, Eng. Tec.ISSN 2070-3740. 37:85-87
Hazen, S. P. and R.W.Ward (1997).Wheat milling and baking quality. Japan Crop Science 37 : 1079–1085.
Laskowski J. and Łysiak G.(1997). Relationships between resistance characteristics of barely kernels and energy consumption during grinding no hammer mill. Int. Agrophysics, 11: 265-271.
Mark, F. (2003). Wheat tempering: mixer alternatives, department of grain science, MF3076, Publications from Kansas State University.Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Pp.: 1-2
Matsuo, R. R. (1988).Evaluation of durum wheat, semolina, and pasta in Canada. In G. Fabriani& C. Lintas (Eds.), Durum wheat: Chemistry and Technology American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A. Pp.: 249-261. 
Novales, B.; S. Guillaume; M. F. Devauxand  M. Chaurand (1998). Particle size characterization of inflow milling products by video image analysis using Global features. Society of Chemical Industry J. Sc. Food Agric. 78 : 187-195.
Owens, G. (2003). “Mill Efficiency.” World Grain, July 2003, pages 20-22.
Posner, E. S. and N. A. Hibbs (2005). “Wheat Flour Milling”, 2d ed. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc.: St Paul Minnesota.
Stoenescu, G.; V. Ionescu; I. Vasilean; I. Aprodu and I. Banu (2010).Technological effects of the wheat cleaning equipment of an industrial mill.The Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati Fascicle VI – Food Technology, 34(2) :54 – 58.
Thiex, N and C. R. Richardson.(2003). Challenges in measuring moisture content of feeds. J. Anim. Sci. 81:3255-3266.
Troccoli, A.; G. M. Borreli;  P. De Vita; C.Fares and N. Di Fonzo (2000). Durum wheat quality: A multidisciplinary concept. Journal of Cereal Science, 32: 99–113.
Woyniak, W. (2001).Mechanical properties of wheat grain in relation to internal cracks. Inst. Agrophysics, Polish Acad. Sciences, Poland. Int. Agrophysics, 15: 59-64