MOLDING OF SOIL WATER REGIME UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION IN EGYPT

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 land reclamation Dept., Faculty of Environmental Engineering., Moscow state University for Environmental Engineering., Russia.

2 Soil and Water Dept. (Agric. Eng.), Fac. of Agric., Fayoum Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Information about the horizontal and vertical distances by which water spreads in soils under a point source is essential for the design of cost effective and efficient drip irrigation systems. The size of the wetting pattern influenced by many factors, including soil physical properties, soil initial conditions as well as emitter discharge rate, irrigation management, crop root characteristics and evapotranspiration. Models can help to predict soil water movement under point source irrigation for a wide range of soil and environmental conditions and varied design parameters and therefore save time and financial resources compared to field experiments.

Main Subjects


Assouline S. 2002. The effects of microdrip and conventional drip irrigation on water distribution and uptake. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66(5): 1630-1636.
Ben-Gal A., Lazarovitch N., Shani U. 2004. Subsurface drip irrigation in gravel-filled cavities. Vadose Zone J. 3(4): 1407–1413.
Bufon V.B., Lascano R.J., Bednarz C., Booker J.D., Gitz D.C. Soil water content on drip irrigated  cotton:  comparison  of  measured  and  simulated  values  obtained  with  the Hydrus 2-D model. Irrig. Sci. 2011; 30 (4):259-273.
Cote C.M., Bristow K.L., Charlesworth P.B., Cook F.J., Thorburn P.J. Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in subsurface trickle irrigation. Irrig. Sci. 2003; 22(3-4): 143–156.
Gardenas A, Hopmans J.W., Hanson B.R., Šimůnek J. Two dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro-irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 2005; 74(3): 219–242.
Kandelous M.M., Šimůnek J. Comparison of numerical, analytical and empirical models to estimate wetting pattern for surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Irrig. Sci. 2010a; 28: 435-444.
Kandelous M.M., Šimůnek J. Numerical simulations of water movement in a subsurface drip irrigation system under field and laboratory conditions using HYDRUS-2D. Agric. Water Manag. 2010b; 97(4): 1070-1076.
Lamm F.R., Ayars J.E., Nakayama F.S. Microirrigation for Crop Production - Design, Operation and Management. Elsevier Publications. 2007; 608.
Lazarovitch N., Šimůnek J., Shani U. System dependent boundary condition for water flow from subsurface source. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005; 69 (1): 46-50.
Lubana P.P.S., Narda N.K. Modelling soil water dynamics under trickle emitters - a review. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2001; 78 (3): 217–232.
Patel  N.,  Rajput  T.B.S.  Dynamics and  modeling of  soil  water  under  subsurface drip irrigated onion. Agric. Water Manag. 2008; 95(12): 1335-1349.
Phogat V., Mahadevan M., Skewes M., Cox J.W.. Modelling soil water and salt dynamics under pulsed and continuous surface drip irrigation of almond and implications of system design. Irrig. Sci. 2012; 30(4): 315-333.
Provenzano G. Using HYDRUS-2D Simulation Model to Evaluate Wetted Soil Volume in Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2007; 133 (4): 342–349.
Skaggs T.H., Trout T.J., Šimůnek J., Shouse P. J. Comparison of Hydrus-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2004; 130(4): 304-310.
Skaggs T.H., Trout T.J., Rothfuss Y. Drip Irrigation Water Distribution Patterns: Effects of Emitter Rate, Pulsing, and Antecedent Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010; 74(6): 1886–1896.
Vermeiren L., Jobling G.A. Localized irrigation. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 36, FAO-UN, Rome, Italy. 1984; 203.