ENGINEERING STUDIES ON GRADING OF ORANGE

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assist. Researcher, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

2 Assoc. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Tanta Univ., Egypt.

3 Prof. of Ag. Eng., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Tanta Univ., Egypt.

4 Head of Res., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Abstract

This work was carried out to study some physical and mechanical properties of orange Navel variety, develop, construct and test of small grading machine for horticultural crops suitable for the small Egyptian farms. To evaluate the performance of the modified grading machine, some engineering factors were studied. These factors were feeding conveyor speeds (0.20, 0.25, 0.30 and 0.35 m/s), grading belts speeds (0.30, 0.40, 0.50 and 0.60 m/s) and grading belts at slope angle (zero deg.). Efficiency indicators such as grading efficiency, machine capacity, power and energy requirements and total mechanical damage were measured and calculated. The obtained results can be summarized as follows: Physical properties of Navel orange were 61.5 - 85.6 mm (length), 61.6 - 85.9 mm (width), 114 - 295 g (weight), 130 - 320 mm3 (volume) and 1.01 (sphericity). The firmness was42.2 N, the rolling angle was 13.12 deg. and the friction angle values were 15 and 11.55 deg. for rubber and metal, respectively. The minimum and maximum grading capacity values were 2.721 t/h and 3.817 t/h at 0.20, 0.30 and 0.35, 0.60 m/s of feeding conveyor and grading belts speeds, respectively for Navel variety. The total mechanical damage values were 0.115% and 0.304% as min. and max., respectively. The minimum machine grading efficiency values were 81.4% and 95.8% as min. and max., respectively. The energy requirements were 7.5 kW.h/t and 0.153kW.h/t for manual and mechanical grading, respectively. The results indicated that fruit feeding conveyor speed (0.20m/s), grading belts speed (0.30 m/s) and zero deg. of grading belts slope angle during grading of orange produced maximum grading efficiency (95.8%) and permissible mechanical damage (0.115%).

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Amin, E. A. (1994): Development of grading machine for some Egyptian farm crops. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 19(7):(2398 – 2411).
Anonymous (2003): Design and development of divergent roller type onion grader.Rajgurunagar, Pune. Technical bulletin No. 6.
Anonymous (2004): Agriculture statistics of Pakistan, 2003-04. Federal Bureau of Statistic's Islamabad Pakistan.
Ashraf, M.; S. S. Muhammad; A. Manzoor and Y. Muhammad (2007): Design, development and performance evaluation of fruit and vegetable grader. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 44(4):704-713.
Dhineshkumar, V. and M. Siddharth (2015): Studies on physical properties of orange fruit. Journal of Food Research and Technology, 3(4):125-130.
Dobrza, S. B. and S. R. Rybczy (2000): A sorting line for uality grading of apple. Zemes KioInzininerija, MoksloDarbai, 32(3):195 – 202.
Jaren, C. and E. Garecia-Pardo (2002): Using non-destructive impact testing for sorting fruits.Journal of food Engineering, 53:89-95.
Mazidi, M., H. Sadrnia and M. Khojastehpour (2016): Evaluation of orange Research Journal, 23(2):899-903.
Ministry of Agricultural and Land Reclamation, Arab Republic of Egypt, Economic Affairs Sector (2013): Bulletin of the agricultural statistics part 12 winter crops 2011/2012.
Mohsenin, N.N., (1986): Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, pp 20-89.
Tabatabaeefar, A. and A. Rajabipour (2005): Modeling the mass of apples by geometrical attributes. Sci. Horticultural Journal, 105:373-382.
Topuz, A.; M. Topakci; M. Canakci; I. Akinci and F. Ozdemir (2005): Physical and nutritional properties of four orange varieties. J. Food Eng. Res., 66:519-523.
Yehia, I.; M. H. Kabeel and M. M. Abdel Galeel (2009): Physical and mechanical properties of Mandarin applied to grading machine. Misr J. of Ag. Eng., 26(2):1036-1053.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics