VERTICAL-FARMING IRRIGATION SYSTEM APPROPRIATE FOR LETTUCE AND CELERY CROPS

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assist. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

The current experiment was carried out in greenhouse in the Central Laboratory of Agricultural Climate, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt, to develop proper system for a Vertical Farming Irrigation System" VFS" for lettuce and celery crops, to get the best vegetative growth uniformity along vertical axis of planting column (tube), maximum water use efficiency (WUE) with minimum energy consumption, and maximum fresh yield per square meter floor. The effects of plant type, nozzle type, vertical-pipe nozzle position, and number of nozzles per vertical farming tube at operating pressure range of 150 to 300 kPa, on growth uniformity, fresh yield (kg/m2). Energy consumptive use and WUE were considered. The initial and operating cost, in addition to net profit of "VFS"are also discussed.
The main results are summarized as follows:

The longest  vegtative growth heights of lettuce and celery,  recorded by using four nozzles along the vertical tube  was 24 and 46 cm at bottom layer of the planted column of the vertical farming tube(VFT),  with increased percent ratios of 37.5 and 52.3% compared with using one mini sprinkler nozzle for the two crops resp..
The highest values of WUE under different number of nozzles and positions was 11.2, 8.8, and 8 kg/m3 for lettuce crop, and 12.8, 12.4, 9.75 kg/m3 for celery crop by using four, two, and one nozzle along the "VFT" axis, with increasing ratios of 21.5, 28.6 % for lettuce crop, and 3, 23.8% for celery crop, compared with micro and fogger nozzles resp..
The maximum energy requirements of lettuce and celery crops were 111.1, 97.2 kj/kg/y for lettuce and celery crops, by using four nozzles (75 μm-DS) along the "VFT" for all tested nozzle types.
The best uniformity of vegetative growth was 96% by using four mini sprinkler nozzles along the "VFT" axis.
The maximum productivities of lettuce  and celery fresh yield were recorded as 14, 11, 10 kg/m2 for lettuce crop, and 16, 12.5, 11.5 kg/m2 for celery crop, for mini sprinkler, micro sprinkler and fogger nozzles resp.,
The maximum consumptive use of energy was 4.32kW.h/y, when using mini sprinkler nozzle, increased by 81% compared with fogger nozzle. Meanwhile the minimum consumptive use of energy was 0.6kW.h/y, when using fogger sprinkler nozzle.
The maximum net profit was 1047, 1527LE/y/column for lettuce and celery crops, by using mini sprinkler (75 μm-DS) with an increase of 42.7, 41.1% for lettuce and celery crops, compared with using fogger nozzle (45 μm-DS).

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Acker, T.; C. Atwater; W. French; M.Glauth; and Smith D., 2015, Energy and water use in Arizona agriculture, Working paper 08–08.
Bakr, A. S.; Hegazy, M.A.M.; Bedir O.M.A.; El-Morsy, A.T. 2017, The effect of some engineering factors of irrigation system by aeroponics, the 13th. Conf. of Agric. Dev. Res.: 115- 131.
Corvalan, C., S. Hales, and A. J. McMichael. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: health synthesis WHO, 240-255.
Eigenbrod, C., and N. Gruda. 2014. Urban vegetable for food security in cities. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35:483–498.
El-Behairy, U. A., 1994, The effect of levels of Phosphorus and Zinc in the nutrient solution on macro and micro nutrient uptake and translocation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown by the Nutrient Film Technique. Ph. D. Univ., London, Wye College England.
Foley, J. A., N. Ramankutty, K. A. Brauman, E. S. Cassidy, J. S. Gerber, M. Johnston, et al. 2011. Soluations for a cultived planet. Nature 478: 337-342.
Jensen, M.E., 1983, Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. Amer.Soc. Agric. Eng. Mich. USA: 827.
Lambin, E. F., H. K. Gibbs, L. Ferreira, R. Grau, P. Mayaux, P. Meyfroidt, Et al. 2013. Estimating the worlds potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach. Glob. Environ. Change 23: 892-901.
NASA Spinoff (2006). Progressive plant growing has business blooming, Environmentaland Agricultural Resources: 68-72.
NASAA Aeroponic Plants(http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/technologies/aeroponic_plants.html)
Pandy, B., and K. C. Seto. 2015. Urbanization and agricultural land loss in india: comparing satellite estimates with census data. J. Environ. Manage. 148:- 53-66, Land Cover/Land Use Change (LC/LUC) and Environmental Impacts in South Asia.
Teegerstrom, T.; Palumbo, J.; Zerkoune, M. 2014Arizona vegetable crop budgets, Western Arizona, Yuma County, La Paz County; Coop.Ext., Coll.of Agric. and Life Sc., U. Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, (AZ1263): 230-245.
Tilman, D., C. Balzer, J. Hill, and B. L. Befort. 2011.Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., USA 108:20260–20264.
Touliators,T., I.C. Dodd, and M. McAinsh, 2016. Vertical farming increases lettuce yield per unit area compared to conventional horizontal hydroponics, Food and Energy Security, (5)3: 184-191.
Raviv M. and Lieth J.H. (2008). Soilless culture; Theory and practice. London: Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0-444-52975-6.
Savvas D. and Passam H (2002), Hydroponic production of vegetables and ornamentals.
Schwab G.O., Frevert R.K. Edminster T.W. and Barnes K.K. 1981. Soil and water conservation engineering. 3rd Ed. John Wiley, N. Y.: 33-34.
Sonneveld C, Straver N. 1994 Voedingsopplossningen voor groenten en bloemen geteeld in water of substrate. Proefstation voor tuinbouw onder glas te Naaldwijk. Voedingsoplossingen glastuinbouw. No. 8. 10th Ed.: 526-555.
The author acknwoldges, the assistance of M.S.Emam and the staff of the (Central lab. Of Ag. Climate, Dokki, Giza, Egypt) for their help in supporting this study.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics