A NEW LOW-COST DETECTION DEVICE FOR EARLY DISCRIMINATION OF EGGS FERTILITY USING ADVANCED STATISTICAL CLASSIFIERS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Agricultural Process Engineering, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt.

2 M. Sc. Student, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt.

Abstract

Detecting fertility methods of hatching eggs is getting an importance with the increase in poultry breeding facilities size to remove the non-hatchable eggs which consume time, space and cost without benefits. Early detection of the infertile eggs is a vital economic issue. Fertility detection methods are expensive to be applied widely, hence this investigation aimed to study the possibility of using a low-cost device as light dependent resistor sensors in detecting the fertility of hatching eggs with high efficient at candling process. Mathematical formulas were developed in this study to discriminate the fertile and infertile eggs by the light dependent resistor sensor and interfaced with a personal computer programmed by LabView software package to execute a certain control decision (is a hatchable egg or not?) via these formulas. Different statistical classifiers have been used to classify eggs into fertile and infertile eggs like linear, quadratic and partial least squares discriminant analyses and support vector machine. According to literature three different times were appointed at earlier times of egg incubation process for fertility identification investigation of 6th, 9th and 12th day. For more identification precision, sensor position for light intensity measuring was investigated at three different measuring orientation lines against the investigated eggs at vertical, inclined 45˚ and horizontal orientation line. Classification mathematical models were developed using the previous classifiers. Principal component and partial least squares regression were used to develop multiple linear regression models for each incubation period. determination

It was found by the Principal Component Analysis, that the sensor orientation line position for light intensity measuring gives different measured values of the same investigated egg, but all these measurement values have an entirely correlation relationship with the classification efficiency. The highest identification rate of 97% obtained by the classifier of linear discriminant analysis at the 6th day of the incubation period by the light dependent resistor sensor, which confirms the efficient use of this simple low-cost sensor in discrimination at earlier times of incubation period closing to the other sophisticated devices. The developed mathematical model can easily be implemented with Fuzzy logic controller; further research will be needed to accomplish the fully automated system. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Akiyama, R.; H. Mitsubayashi; H. Tazawa and W. W. Burggren. 1999. Heart rate responses to altered ambient oxygen in early (days 3–9) chick embryos in the intact egg. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 169(2): 85-92.
Bain, M. M.; A. J. Fagan; J. M. Mullin; I. McNaught and B. Condon. 2007. Monitoring chick development in ovo from 12 days incubation through to hatching by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 26: 198-201.
Bhuvaneshwari, M. M. and P. G. Scholar. 2015. Improvement in detection of chicken egg fertility using image processing techniques. International Journal on Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2(4): 64-67.
Cain, J. R.; U. K. Abbott and V. L. Rogallo. 1967. Heart rate of the developing chick embryo. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 126(2): 507-510.
Cen, H. and Y. He. 2007. Theory and application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in determination of food quality. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(2): 72-83.‏
Cocchi, M.; C. Durante; G. Foca; A. Marchetti; L.Tassi and A. Ulrici. 2006. Durum wheat adulteration detection by NIR spectroscopy multivariate calibration. Talanta, 68(5): 1505-1511.
Coucke, P. M.; G. M. Room; E. M. Decuypere and J. G. De Baerdemaeker. 1997. Monitoring embryo development in chicken eggs using acoustic resonance analysis. Biotechnology Progress, 13(4): 474-478.
Deng, X.; Q. Wang; H. Chen and H. Xie. 2010. Eggshell crack detection using a wavelet-based support vector machine. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 70(1): 135-143.‏
Elmessery, W. M. and S. E. Abdallah. 2014. Manufacture evolution of a microbial contamination detection unit for processed tomatoes inside food factories. AMA-Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 45(4): 32-38.
FAO. 2009. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Mapping traditional poultry hatcheries in Egypt. Prepared by M. Ali Abd-Elhakim, Olaf Thieme, Karin Schwabenbauer and Zahra S. Ahmed. AHBL - Promoting strategies for prevention and control of HPAI, Rome.
Faris, D. M. and M. B. Mahmood. 2014. Data acquisition of greenhouse using Arduino. Journal of Babylon University/Pure and Applied Sciences, 22(7): 1908-1916.
Hai-ling, L.; C. AiJian-rong; S. Li; Y. Lei-ming and L. Meng-le. 2016. Research on the discrimination of hatching eggs activity based on thermal imaging: A food nondestructive testing practice. International Journal of Smart Home, 10(2): 175-186.
Hopfer, H.; S. E. Ebeler and H. Heymann. 2014. Comparison of different data analysis tools to study the effect of storage conditions on wine sensory attributes and trace metal composition. In: Food informatics. Springer International Publishing, 213-231.
Howe, R. S.; W. W. Burggren and S. J. Warburton. 1995. Fixed patterns of bradycardia during late embryonic development in domestic fowl with C locus mutations. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 268(1): H56-H60.‏
Johnson, G. W. and R. Jennings. 2006. LabView graphical programming. 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill‏, New York, USA.
Jones, S. T.; R. E. Shattuck and A. I. Center. 2005. Detection of Early Embryonic Development in hatching eggs: a hyper spectral imaging systems and neural network approach. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 1: 67-73.
Kato, K.; K. Moriya; E. Dzialowski; W. W. Burggren and H. Tazawa. 2002. Cardiac rhythms in prenatal and perinatal emu embryos. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 131(4): 775-785.‏
Klein, S.; M. Rokitta; U. Baulain; J. Thielebein; A. Haase and F. Ellendorff. 2002. Localization of the fertilized germinal disc in the chicken egg before incubation. Poultry science, 81(4): 529-536.
Liang, S.; J. Liu; Z. S. Zhang and X. Li. 2011. Monitoring of live chick embryo based on acoustic and vibration signals with a new semi-invasive technology. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2(5): 127-131.‏
Lin, H.; J. W. Zhao; Q. S. Chen; J. R. Cai and P. Zhou. 2009. Eggshell crack detection based on acoustic impulse response and supervised pattern recognition. Czech Journal of Food Science, 27(6): 393-402.
Liu, L and M. O. Ngadi. 2013. Detecting fertility and early embryo development of chicken eggs using near-infrared hyper spectral imaging. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 6(9): 2503-2513.
Maranhão, G. N. D. A.; A. U. Brito; A. M. Leal; J. K. S. Fonseca and W. N. Macêdo. 2015. Using LDR as sensing element for an external fuzzy controller applied in photovoltaic pumping systems with variable-speed drives. Sensors, 15(9), 24445-24457.‏
Moriya, K.; J. T. Pearson; W. W. Burggren; A. Ar and H. Tazawa. 2000. Continuous measurements of instantaneous heart rate and its fluctuations before and after hatching in chickens. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203(5): 895-903.‏
Moriya, K.; J. Höchel; J. T. Pearson and H. Tazawa. 1999. Cardiac rhythms in developing chicks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 124(4): 461-468.
Narushin, V. G. and M. N. Romanov. 2002. Egg physical characteristics and hatchability. World's Poultry Science Journal, 58:297–303.
Nurdiyah, D. I. A. M. 2016. Comparison support vector machine and k-nearest neighbor for classification fertile and infertile eggs based on GLCM texture analysis. Journal Transformatika, 13(2): 29-34.‏
Önler, E.; I. H. Çelen; T. Gulhan and B. Boynukara. 2017. A study regarding the fertility discrimination of eggs by using ultrasound. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 51(2): 322-326.
Pradeep, K. P. J.; K. S. P. Reddy; D. H. Kumar; K. N. Raju and C. Nagaraja. 2014. Monitoring of temperature and humidity using LIFA. International Journal of IT, Engineering and Applied Sciences Research (IJIEASR), 3(6): 1-3.‏‏
Smith, D. P.; K. C. Lawrence and G. W. Heitschmidt. 2008. Fertility and embryo development of broiler hatching eggs evaluated with a hyper spectral imaging and predictive modeling system. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7(10): 1001-1004.
Sun, J.; S. L. Cong; H. P. Mao; X. Zhou; X. H. Wu and X. D. Zhang. 2017. Identification of eggs from different production systems based on hyperspectra and CS-SVM. British poultry science, 1-6.
Tazawa, H.; H. Mitsubayashi; M. Hirata; J. Höchel and J. T. Pearson. 1999. Cardiac rhythms in chick embryos during hatching. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 124(4): 511-521.‏
USDA. 2006. Poultry: Chickens and eggs. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Washington, DC.
Yongwei, W.; J. Wang; B. Zhou and Q. Lu. 2009. Monitoring storage time and quality attribute of egg based on electronic nose. Analytica Chimica Acta, 650(2): 183-188.
Zhao, J.; H. Lin; Q. Chen; X. Huang; Z. Sun and F. Zhou. 2010. Identification of egg’s freshness using NIR and support vector data description. Journal of food Engineering, 98(4): 408-414.
Zhihui, Z.; L. Ting; X. Dejun; W. Qiaohua and M. Meihu. 2015. Nondestructive detection of infertile hatching eggs based on spectral and imaging information. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 8(4): 69-76.‏
Zhu, Z. and M. Ma. 2011. The identification of white fertile eggs prior to incubation based on machine vision and least square support vector machine. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(12): 2699-2704.