THE POSSIBILITY OF IMPROVING SURFACE IRRIGATION WITH BLOCKED END ON SPARSE GRAPE TREES

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate Professor, Agricultural Engineering Dept., Minofia University, Shibin El-Kom, 32511, Egypt.

Abstract

Border system that applies water over the whole soil surface is a widely used method of surface irrigation in Egypt to irrigate grape farms. Furrow system can be used to lessen water applied per irrigation in distant parallel channels to partially wet the soil surface along with plants line. A field study was carried out in northern Egypt to authorize using distant furrows rather than borders as an improving irrigation system for grape farms on a clay loam soil with 1.3 g cm-3 bulk density during 2008 season in Shibin El-Kom area, Egypt. Border irrigation was practiced to apply 9.8, 12.0, and 15.5 m2/h inflow rate per unit width when gravimetric soil moisture content was initialized at 24.7%. A 9.8 m2/h per unit width was applied when soil moisture content by weight was initialized as 21.4, 24.7, and 27.1%. Inflow rates of 2.2, 3.0, 4.0 m3/h were applied by furrow irrigation at 25.1% initial moisture content by weight. Gravimetric initial moisture contents 22.7, 25.4, and 27.2% were initialized under furrow irrigation with 2.2 m3/h inflow rate. The results showed that the greater inflow rate or the wetter initial soil surface was applied, the smaller water advance time and the greater recession time were occurred. Infiltrated water depth was individually increased by decreasing either inflow rate or initial soil moisture content. Coefficient of variation as well as distribution and application efficiencies was generally improved by increasing inflow rate, initial soil moisture content, or storage phase time. Water use per day was ranged from 4.9 to 6.1 mm by border irrigation and from 2.8 to 3.6 mm by partially wetted furrow irrigation. Water saving was achieved as 39.5-49% by partially wetted furrow irrigation compared to border as practiced in grape farm. Grape yield was significantly improved with increasing inflow rate, initial moisture, and storage phase.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Alazba, A.A. (1999). Dimensionless advance curves for infiltration families. Agricultural water management, 41, 115-131.
Amer, K.H. (2007). Surface irrigation evaluation based on analytical interrelation among water infiltration, advance, and recession. Proceeding of Irrigation Association, 9-11 Dec in San Diego, CA: 433-445. 
Bishop, A.A. (1962). Relation of intake rate to length of run in surface irrigation. Trans. of  the ASCE 127 part III.
Blair, A.W. and E.T. Smerdon (1988). Unimodal surface irrigation efficiency. J. of Irrig. And Drain. Div., ASCE, 114(1), 156-167.
Cahoon, J.E., P.A. Mandel, and D. E. Eisenhauer (1995). Management recommendations for sloping blocked-end furrow irrigation. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, ASAE, 11(4), 527-533.
DeTar, W.R. (1989). Infiltration functions from furrow stream advance. J. Irrigation Drainage Eng. ASCE 115 (4), 722–730.
Dholakia, M., R. Misra, and  M.S. Zaman (1998). Simulation of border irrigation system using explicit MacCormack finite difference method. Agric. Water Manage., 36, 181-200.
Elliot, R.L. and  W.R. Walker (1982). Field evaluation of furrow infiltration and advance functions. Trans. ASAE 15(2), 369–400.
Green, R.E. and C.W. Guernsey (1984). Soil-water relations and physical properties of irrigated soils in the Kula area, Island of Maui, Hawaii. Res. Bull., 173, HawaiiUniversity.
Hartley, D.M. (1992). Interpretation of Kostiakow infiltration parameters for borders. J. Irrrig. Drain. Eng. 118(1), 156-165).
Holizapfel, E.A., Marino, M.A.,  Morales,  J.C., 1984. Comparison and selection of furrow irrigation models. Agricultural water management, 9, 105-125.
Hume, I.H. (1993) Determination of infiltration characteristics by volume balance for border check irrigation. Agric. Water Manage., 23, 23-39.
Foroud, N., E.S. George, and T. Entz (1996). Determination of infiltration rate from border irrigation advance and recession trajectories. Agricultural Water Management 30, 133-142.
Kostiakov, A.N (1932). On the dynamics of coefficient of water-percolation in soils and the necessity of studying it from a dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioratium. Trans. Com. Int. Soc. Soil Sci. 6, 267–272.
Maheshwari, B.L., A.K. Turner, T.A.McMahon, and B.J Campbell (1988). An optimization technique for estimating infiltration characteristics in border irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 13, 13-24.
Michael, A.M. and A.C. Pandya (1971). Hydraulic resistance relationship in irrigation borders. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 13(1), 72-80.
Rodriguez, J.A. (2003). Estimation of advance and infiltration equations in furrow irrigation for untested discharges. Agricultural Water Management 60, 227–239.
Scaloppi, E.J., G.P. Merkley, and L.S. Willardson (1995). Intake parameters from advance and wetting phases of surface irrigation. J. Irrigation Drainage Eng. ASCE 121 (1), 57–70.
Smerdon, E.T., A.W. Blair, and D.L. Reddell (1988). Infiltration from irrigation advance data. I. Theory. J. Irrigation Drainage Eng. ASCE 114 (1), 4–17.
Valiantzas, J.D., S. Aggelides, and A. Sassalou (2000). Furrow infiltration estimation from time to a single advance point. Agricultural Water Management 52, 17-32.
Vaziri, C.M. and I. P. Wu (1972). Volume balance analysis to determine water infiltration and efficiency in Hawaiian sugarcane furrows. Hawaiian Sugar Planters Association 58(20), 283-292.
Walker, W.R. and G.V. Skogerboe (1987). Surface irrigation: Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632, 386 pp.
Wu, I.P. (1971). Overland flow hydrograph analysis to determine infiltration function. Trans. of  the ASAE. 14(2): 294-300.
Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 2
April 2009
Pages 836-865

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics