LASER CLASSIFICATION OF OLIVE FRUITS DURING MATURITY ACCORDING TO OPTICAL PROPERTIES

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assoc. Prof., Nat. Inst. of Laser Enhanced Sc. (NILES), Cairo Univ., Egypt.

2 Senior Researcher, Agr. Eng. Res. Inst., Agr. Res. Center, El-Dokki, Cairo, Egypt.

3 Postgraduate, Nat. Inst. of Laser Enhanced Sc. (NILES), Cairo Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

The aim of this study was measuring and determination of the optical properties of olive maturity stages (Arbquina variety) using visible laser with 543.5 nm with power 4 mW. The obtained results were as follows: a) The  intensity reflection percentages 1.36, 1.0 and 0.51% or absorption percentages 98.64, 99 and 99.49% not accepted for stages 1,2 and 3 respectively. Also, reflection percentage of 0.42% or  absorption percentage of 99.58% for stage 5 was refused, b) The intensity reflection percentage 0.47% or the absorption percentage 99.53% was indicator to the best maturity index (2.65) of olive variety. This is considering optical properties instead of ideal maturity index to determine harvesting time., d) Stage 1 was high reflection intensity percentage or low absorption intensity percentage followed with high moisture content and low oil content percentages. Meanwhile, stage 5 with low reflection intensity percentage or high absorption intensity percentage was of low moisture content and high oil content percentages. So, the stage 4 was considered suitable for oil extracting, because of low moisture content 40.41 % and high oil content 19.22 %.   It was standard to identify olive maturity stages to get high oil percentage according to optical properties.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Boskou, D. (1996). (Ed.), Olive oil: Chemistry and technology, AOCS Press,  Pp.:114.
Diaz, R.,  G. Faus; M. Blasco; J. Blasco; and E. Molto (2000). The application of a fast algorithm for the classification of olives by machine vision. Food Res. Int., 33: 305–309.
Diaz, R.;  L. Gil; C. Serrano; M. Blasco; E. Molto and J. Blasco (2004). Comparison of three algorithms in the classification of table olives by means of computer vision. J. of Food Eng., 61 : 101–107.
Gunasekaran, S. (1996). Computer vision technology for food quality assurance. Trends in Food Sc. and Tec., 7(8): 245–256.
Gutierrez, F.; T. Arnaud and A. M. Albi (1999). Influence of ecological cultivation on virgin olive oil quality. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 76 (5): 617–621.
Jamieson, V. (2002). Physics raises food standards. Physics World, 1: 21–22.
Montgomery, J. L.; F.C. Parrish; D.G. Olson; J. S. Dickson and S. Niebulu (2003). Storage and packaging effects on sensory and color  characteristics of ground beef. Meat Sc., 64:357-363.
Mousa, Y. M.; D. Gerasopoulos; L. Metzidakis and A. Kiritsakis (1996). Effect of altitude on fruit and oil quality characteristics of mastoids olives. J. Sc. of Food and Ag., 71: 345–349.
Owen, R. W.; A. Giacosa; W. E. Hull; R. Haubner; G. Wurtele; B. Spiegelhalder and H. Bartsch (2000). Olive oil consumption and health: The possible role of antioxidants. Lancet Oncology, 1: 107– 112.
Roca, M. and M. I. Mınguez-Mosquera (2001). Change in the natural ratio between chlorophylls and carotenoid in olive fruit during processing for virgin olive oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 78: 133–138.
Wang, H.H. and D.W. Sun, (2002). A Correlation between cheese melt ability determined with a computer vision method and with Arnott and Schreiber. J. of Food Sc., 67(2):745–749.