RESPONSE OF POTATO YIELD AND WATER EFFICIENCY TO DEFICIT DRIP AND FURROW IRRIGATION

Sahari, Suliman Qausi; Bamaga, Omar Ahmed; Al-Jendary, Ali Abdul Kareem

doi:10.21608/mjae.2013.102018

RESPONSE OF POTATO YIELD AND WATER EFFICIENCY TO DEFICIT DRIP AND FURROW IRRIGATION

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Assist. Prof., Dep. of Agr. Eng., Fac. Agr, Sana’a U., Yemen

² Assoc. Prof., Dep.t of Agr. Eng, Fac Agr, Sana’a U., Yemen

³ Sen. Res., Gen. Auth. Agr. Res., Yemen

10.21608/mjae.2013.102018

Abstract

Potatoes is one of the main vegetable irrigated-crops in Yemen which uses large quantity of irrigation water, mainly because surface irrigation methods, characterized with low efficiency, are mostly used. This study aims to improve water use efficiency (WUE) for growing potatoes through applying deficit irrigation technique coupled with drip and furrow irrigation methods. The study was undertaken at the College of Agriculture farm having clayey loam soil. Drip irrigation system was compared with furrow irrigation system at three levels of deficit irrigation, namely :100%, 80% and 60 % of ET₀. For the drip irrigation method, the potatoes yield was found 24.9 t/ha and 17.5 t/ha for irrigation levels of 100 and 60 % of ET₀, respectively.
While for furrow irrigation method, the yield was found 21.1 t/ha and 15.3 t/ha for irrigation levels of 100 and 60 % of ET₀, respectively. The results showed linear increase in WUE with the decrease in irrigation levels. For drip irrigation method, the WUE increased from 6.2 kg/ m³ at full irrigation level to 7.3 kg/m³ for irrigation level 60 % of ET₀. The WUE for furrow irrigation methods was lower and was 3.4 kg/ m³ and 4.1 kg/ m³ for irrigation levels of 100 and 60 % of ET₀, respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Agricultural Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

References

کتاب الإحصاء الزراعی لعام (2007) – وزارة الزراعة والری - الإدارة العامة للإحصاء الزراعی- الجمهوریة الیمنیة : ص 12-32.

مکرد .ع . ع . (2001) الدلیل الزراعی – المرتفعات الوسطى- الهیئة العامة للبحوث والإرشاد الزراعی . وزارة الزراعة- الجمهوریة الیمنیة : ص 83-92.

Alexander, R. 2005. Crop production under deficit irrigation. Dep. of Civil and Arch. Eng. and Grad. Sch.Un Wyoming.

Eldredge, E.P., Shock, C.C. and Stieber, T.D. 1992. Plot sprinklers for irrigation research. Agronomy Journal 84: 1081-1084.

English, M. and Raja, S.N. 1996. Perspectives on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 32: 1-14.

FAO. 2002. Deficit irrigation practice. Water Reports. No. 22. FAO, Rome. 100pp

Lynch, D.R., Foroud, N., Kozub, G.C. and Farries, B.C. 1995. The effect of moisture stress at three growth stages on the yield components of yield and processing quality of eight potato cultivars. American Potato Journal 72: 375-386.

Pene, C.B.G., and G.K Edi. 1996. Sugarcane yield response to deficit irrigation at two grown stages. In: Nuclear tech. to Assess irrigation schedules for field crops. IAEA, TECDOC 888, p: p. 115-129,Vienna.

Shock, C.C., Holmes, Z.A., Stieber, T.D., Eldredge, E.P. and Zhang P. 1993. The effect of timed water stress on quality, total solids and reducing sugar content of potatoes. American Potato Journal 70: 227-241

Shock C. C and Feibert E.B.G. 2002. Deficit irrigation of potato.In: Deficit Irrigation Practice. Water Reports. No. 22. FAO, Rome. :100pp.

Trimmer, W. L. 1990. Applying partial irrigation in Pakistan. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 116(3), 342-353 .

Wright, J.L. & Stark J.C. 1990. Potato. In: B.A. Stewart and D.R. Neilsen, eds. Irrigation of agricultural crops – Agronomy. Monograph No. 30,PP. 859-888, Madison, Wisc., USA, ASA-CSSA-SSSA.