SELECTING THE PROPER CONDITIONS FOR THRESHING LENTIL AND BEAN

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assis. Prof. of Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

Filed experiments were carried out to select the optimum conditions for threshing both lentil and bean in order to minimize energy consumed and criterion cost under Egyptian conditions. All experiments were conductedunder three variables for both lentil and bean: four material feed rates of (0.7, 0.75, 0.8 and 0.85) Mg/h and (0.6, 0.65, 0.7 and 0.75) Mg/h, four drum speeds of 450, 480, 510 and 540 rpm and 460, 490, 520 and 550 rpm and four seed moisture contents (wb) of (14.1, 12.3, 10.6 and 9.7 %) and (13.5, 12.4, 10.2 and 9.1 %)for lentil and bean, respectively. Threshing machine performance was evaluated in terms of threshing losses, threshing and cleaning efficiency, energy requirements and criterion cost. The experimental results reveal to the following:

The suitable feed rates to thresh lentil and bean were 0.8 and 0.7 Mg/h, respectively.
The proper drum speed for threshing lentil and bean were 510 and 520 rpm, respectively.
The optimum seed moisture content suitable for threshing lentil and bean were 10.6 and 10.2 %, respectively.

Main Subjects


Abd El-Atty, A. A. A; M. A. Hassan; M; K. Afify and Hanan M. El-Shal (2012)Study on the mechanization of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) crop under Egyptian condition. Zagazig  J. Agric. Res., Vol. 39 No. (3) 2012: 529-538.
Agricultural Economic Bulletin (2010): Ministry of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt.
Awady, M. N. (1978): Tractor and farm machinery. Text book, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Pp: 164-167.
Awady, M. N; E. Y. Ghoniem and A. I. Hashish (1982): A critical comparison between wheat combine harvesters under Egyptian conditions. R. S. No. 1920, Ain-Shams Univ. J. 1982.
Greven, M. M; B. A. McKenzie; J. G. Hampton; M. J. Hill and G.D. Hill (2001): Some factors affecting seed qualityduring the mechanical threshing ofdwarf French bean (Phaseolusvulgaris L.). Agronomy New Zealand,31: 121-126.
Greven, M. M; B. A. McKenzie; J. G. Hampton; M. J. Hill; J. R. Sedcole and G. D. Hill (2004). Factors affecting seed quality in dwarf French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) before harvest maturity. Seed Science andTechnology, 32: 797-811.
Herat, L. G. (1992): Effects of maturity and seed size on seed vigor and plant growth in snap bean (Phaseoulus vulgaris L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, pp.117
Hunt, D. (1983): Farm power and machinery management. 8th Ed. Iowa state Univ., Press Ames, USA. Ames, Iowa, USA: 364-368.
Mishram, T. N. and K. Desta (1990): Development and performance evaluation of a sorghum thresher. Agric. Mech. In ISIA, 21 (3): 33-37.
Morad, M. M; A. S. El-Kot, M. M. Ali, H. M. Salem (2007): Study on the mechanization of cowpea crop production under Egyptian conditions. Misr  J. Agric. Eng., 24(3) : 450-467.
Moussa, A. I. (2006): The effect of selected mechanical threshing parameters on threchability of some legume crops.J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 31(7): 1-24.
Souza, C. M. A; D. M. Queiroz; E.C. Mantovani and P.R. Cecon (2002): Effect of mechanical harvesting on the quality of seeds of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista Brasileira de Armazenamento, 27(1): 21-29
Stallknecht, G; K. M. Gilbertson, G. R. Carlson, J. L. Eckhoff, G. D. Kushnak, J. R. Sims, M. P. Westcott and D. M. Wichman (1995):  Production of Chickpeas in Montana. Montana Agr. Res.12:46-50.
Suleiman, K; L. Hulya; E. Benian; A. Alison and M. Stanley (2012): Effects of seed moisture content and threshing methods on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed quality. Suleiman Demirel Universities Ziraat Faculties Dergisi 7 (1):51-57, 2012.
Zaalouk, A. K. (2009): Evaluation of local machine performance for threshing bean. . Misr J. of Agric. Eng., 26 (4): 1696-1709.