WATER SAVING WITH THE USE OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Prof. of Agric. Eng., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig University, Egypt.

2 Assist. Prof. of Agric. Eng., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig University, Egypt.

3 Assist. Researcher, Water Management Research Inst., N.W.R.C. , Egypt.

Abstract

The performance of three different irrigation systems (drip, sub-surface and sprinkler irrigation) in terms of actual irrigation water requirements, crop yield, water use efficiency and water saving was experimentally investigated under condition of sugar-beet planting in sandy soil.
Water saving through the use of the three irrigation systems was studied as a function of change in water regime (100, 75 and 50%) and planting dates (1 Oct., 20 Oct. and 10 Nov.).
Water saving was also recorded in the case of planting using compost comparing with the case of planting with no compost.
The experimental results reveal to the following:
- The highest amount of water saving was recorded under the use of sub-surface irrigation system with 50% water regime in the case of using compost and with delaying planting date to 10 Nov.
-  The highest values of crop yield and water use efficiency were found under the use of drip irrigation system with 100% water regime in the case of using compost and at 1 Oct. planting date.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abd El-Wahab, S. A., A. A. Amer, M. I. El-Shahawy and M.M. Sobh(1996). Effect of different irrigation amounts and polassium fertilizer rates on yield and quality of sugar-beet and water efficiencies (1996). J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. Vol. 21 No. (12): 4687- 4699.
Abdou, S. M. M. , K.M. Abd El- Latif, R. M. F. Farrag and K. M. R. Yousef (2011). Response of Sunflower Yield and Water Relations to Sowing Dates and Irrigation Scheduling Under Middle Egypt Condition. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 2 (3):141-150.
Andrew W. L. (2008). Planting date and Preplant Weed management Influence Yield, Water Use, and Weed Seed Production in Herbicide-Free Forage Barley. Weed Technology 22:486–492.
Awad,Y.H.(1998). Newly reclaimed soil and wheat yield as affected by FYM and gypsum under different irrigation regimes. Zagazig J.Agric.Res.25(4):671-677.
Chartzoulakis, K. S. and N. G. Michelakis (1988). Influence of different irrigation systems in greenhouse tomatoes. Acta. Hort. (228): 97-104.  
Cucci, G. and A. de Caro (1986). Impact of irrigation on productivity of autumn – sown sugar-beet in Italy. Institute de Agron colivazloni erbascee dell Univ. di Bari, Bari, Italy. Irrigation Drenaggio, Vol.33 (4): 29-32. (C.F. irrigation and drainge Abst. 13-1332, 1987).
Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt (1977). Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation & Drainage Paper (24), FAO, Rome.
Farsiani, A., Mohammad-Eghbal Ghobadi and Saeid Jalali-Honarmand (2011). The effect of water deficit and sowing date on yield components and seed sugar contents of sweet corn (Zea mays L.). African Journal of Agric. Research Vol. 6(26) : 5769-5774.
Ghanem S.A and R.A. Ebaid (2001). Effect of farm yard manure and water regims on productivity of rice and succeeding clover crop. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci., 16 (6): 115-128.
Hanson, B. and D. May (2004). Effects of subsurface drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth, soil salinity, and profitability. Agric. Water Manage. 68:1-17.
James, L. G. (1988). Principles of farm irrigation system design, Krieger publishing company, Krieger Drive, Malabar, Florida.
Jensen, M.E. (1983). Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. ASAE, Michigan, USA., pp: 827.
Klute, A. (1986).  Methods of Soil Analysis. Part-1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. (2nd ed.) American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Lytle, B., N. Hansen, F. Jaeger and J. Nikkel, (2008). A win-win scenario for urban/rural water supplies. The Water Report, Issue #48.
 Mamo, M. (2000). The effect of MSW compost application on soil water and water stress in irrigated corn. Compost Science & Utilization, 8, 236-246.
Mevhibe A, E. Gunes and B. Gulcubuk. (2010). The effects of irrigation methods on input use and productivities of sugar-beet in Central Anatolia, Turkey. African J. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Vol. 5, Issue 3, 188-195.
Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (1982). Methods of soil Analysis. Part-2: chemical microbiological properties. (2nd ed.). American Soc. of Agron., Madison, Wisconsen, U.S.A.
Perry, C., P. Steduto, R. G. Allen and C. M. Burt (2009). “Increasing productivity in irrigated agriculture: Agronomic constraints and hydrological realities.” Agric. Water Management, (96): 1517-1524.
Sakellariou-makrantonaki M., D. Kalfountzos and P. Vyrlas (2002). water saving and yield increase of sugar-beet with subsurface drip irrigation. Global Nest: the Int. J. Vol. 4, No. 2-3, 85-91.
Topak R., S. Su¨heri and B. Acar (2011). Effect of different drip irrigation regimes on sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, quality and water use efficiency in Middle Anatolian, Turkey. Irr. Sci. 29:79–89.