DESIGN AND IMPACT OF USING TRICKLE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR GREENHOUSES IN DELTA REGION IN EGYPT

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, Fac. of Agric, Damietta branch, Mansoura University, Egypt.

2 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, Fac. of Agric, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt

3 Associate Professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, Fac. of Agric, Mansoura University, Egypt

Abstract

Analysis and hydraulic calculations are directed to optimize a suitable design of low pressure gravity-fed water systems for greenhouses and smallholder farms.  The experiment was conducted to analyze the impact of key design factors such as the required head (2, 3, 4 and 5 m), emitter spacing [(0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 m for in–line non-pressure compensated (INPC) emitters and 0.4, 0.7, 1.0 and 1.3 for on-line pressure compensated (OPC)], discharge capacity and emitter type (INPC and OPC) and their effect on the maximum lateral length (MLL) which was defined as the length with flow variation that is less than or equal to 5% in a low-pressure gravity fed trickle system. INPC emitters had the highest effect of the head on the maximum lateral length (MLL) at all emitter spacing under study. Spacing of 1.2 and 1.3 m for the INPC and OPC emitters, respectively, had the highest effect on the MLL. However, the lowest values of MML were 11.96 and 17.53 m, which were for 0.3 and 0.4 m spacing in INPC and OPC emitters, respectively. Also, the combine model of variables without their interactions has indicated that INPC emitters perform the highest MLL and the other variables in the model were significant. Such equations could be used to decide the MLL for a given spacing under the available head of the water supply system. In both NPC and INPC emitters, increasing the head level increased total tomato yield and there were significant decreasing in yield by increasing emitter spacing, where maximum yield was 43.6 ton/ha at 5 m head for INPC emitters and  44.4 ton /ha at 4 m head for OPC  emitters with emitter spacing 0.3 and 0.4 m respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bralts, V. F.; I. P. Wu and M. Giltin (1982). Emitter plugging and drip irrigation lateral line hydraulics. Trans. ASAE 25 (5), p: 1274 – 81.
Berihun, B. (2011). Effect of mulching and amount of water on the yield of tomato under drip irrigation. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 3 (7), p: 200-206.
Cheema, D. S.; P.  Kaur and S. Kaur (2005).  Off-season cultivation of tomato under nethouse conditions. Paper Presented at VII Int. Symp. on Protected Cult. Mild Winter Climates: Prod. Pest Management and Global Competition. Acta Hort., 659, p: 1-14.
Harmanto; V. M. Salokhe and M. S.  Babel (2004). Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment. Agric.Water Managt. 71, p:  225-242.
IDE, International Development Enterprises (2010). Ideal micro irrigation systems. Technical manual, IDE, Lakewood, CO 80215, USA, P: 3-8.
Jaiswal, A. P.; V. V. Aware and A. G. Powar ( 2001).  Field Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of Drip Irrigation System.  Micro Irrigation. Central board of Irrigation and Power, p:1, 3 New Delhi, India.
Malash, N. M.; T. J. Flowers and A. R. Ragab (2005). Effect of irrigation systems and water management practices using saline and non-saline water on tomato production. Agricultural Water Management 78, p: 25-38.
Michel, A. M. (1978).  Irrigation Theory and Practice. Viscus Publishing House (Pvt) Ltd., 576 Masjid Road, Jangparc, New Delhi. Chapter 3, p: 216 - 222. 
Nour El Din, M. (2007). Energy for Irrigation Water in Egypt. Plan Bleu/MEDITEP Regional Workshop, Water, Energy and Climate Change in the Mediterranean, Carthage, Tunisia. 17 December 2007.
Shedeed, S. I.; S. M. Zaghloul, A. A. Yassen (2009). Effect of Method and Rate of Fertilizer Application under Drip Irrigation on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Tomato. Ozean Journal of Applied Sciences 2 (2), p: 139-147.