A PORTABLE CHEMICAL INJECTION UNIT FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assoc. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Col. of Ag., Al -Azhar U., Assiut.. Egypt.

Abstract

The principal aim of this research is to study the affecting factors  the design of a portable chemical (fertilizers, pesticides, and anti-clogging agents) injection unit (CIU) powered with engine, and evaluate the designed (CIU) with pressurized irrigation system, for easy operation and maintenance of chemigation application to cover growers/irrigation designers needs  for efficient (CIU) with independent power supply, using an economical materials available in thelocal market, and to add the designed (CIU) as a choice in expert system program help in proper selection  of  (CIU) according to field conditions, and to overcome field chemigation problems in pressurized irrigation system at many farms such as; unavailable power source, limited irrigation quantity and time period, long or large main line distance/size and improper field location to water source and irrigation pump. In addition, the designed chemigation injection unit (CIU) is compared with other fertilizer injectors available in the local market.
The main results in this study can be summarized in the following:
* Average injection rate ranged from 0.1 to 0.25 m3/h, for imported injectors, and 0.1 to 1.2 m3/h for developed CIU.  Injection pressure ranged from 2 to 4 bar. (200 - 400 kPa) and from 0.5 to 4 bar. (50 - 400 kPa) for imported injector and developed CIU respectively.
* The average uniformity of injection rate was 99 % during chemigation time for developed injection unit .
* Economical verification of the feasibility of using the developed and imported injectors is discussed.

Main Subjects


Awady, M. N. ,1978, Tractor and farm machinery. Txt bk., Col. Ag., Ain Shams U.: 146-167.
Badr, A. A., Ebabi, F. G., and ELtomy, E. O., 2006, Fertigation methods effects on water and fertilizer uniformity in drip irrigation, Misr J. Ag. Eng., 23(1): 122 – 136.
Bakeer, G. A., 2002 a, Chemical injection effect on deep whell-pump in drip irrigation,Misr J. Ag. Eng., 19(4): 821- 840.
Bakeer, G. A., 2002 b, Fertigation methods effects onwater and fertilizer uniformity in drip irrigation,Misr J. Ag. Eng., 19(4): 821- 840.
Christiansen, J.E., 1942, Irrigation by Sprinkling. Califor­nia Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin, No. 670.
Coates, R. W., Sahoo, P. K., Schwankl, L. J. and Delwiche, M. J., 2012, Fertigation techniques for use with multiple hydrazones in simultaneous operation. Precision  13(2): 219-235.
El Nakib, A. A., Rasmy, A. S.,  and Mahmoud,  A. A., 2011, Evaluation of a pneumatic orchard tree pruning machine ( prototype),Misr J. Ag. Eng., 28(4): 91- 106.
EL Zuraiqi S., Rusan, M. J., and AL Qawasmi, W., 2004, Fertigation in Jordan, IPI Regional Workshop on Potassium and Fertigation development in West Asia and North Africa; Rabat, Morocco: 24-28.
El-Gindy, A. M, Tayel, M.Y. , El-Bagoury, K.F., and Sabreen, K. A., 2009,  Effect of injector type and nitrogen treatment on emitters clogging,  Misr J. Ag. Eng., 26(3): 1263- 1276
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD, 2008, BS ISO 13457,  Agricultural irrigation equipment-Water-driven chemical injector pumps,  2 nd.: 1-22.
Janos,  L., 1995, Application of chemicals through irrigation systems. ICID J. 45 No. 2: 125-146.
Jiusheng, L., Yibin, M., and Bei, L., 2007, Field evaluation of fertigation uniformity as affected by injector type and manufacturing variability of emitters, Ir. Sc., Volume 25 (2): 117-125.
Kassem, M. A., and AL-Suker, A., 2009, Effect of fertigation methods on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency for wheat and barly crops, Misr J. Ag. Eng., 26(2): 866- 885.
Kranz, W. L., Eisenhauer, D. E., Parkhurst, A. M., 1996, Calibration accuracy of chemical injection devices, Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 12(2): 189-196.
Negm, A. M., 1993, Descriptive and analytical statistics by using ready made software,  P. 199.(In Arabic).