METHANE PRODUCTION BY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION FROM CATTLE DUNG AND CHICKEN MANURE UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Prof., Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt.

2 Prof. of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Soil and Water Dept., Fac. of Agric., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt.

3 Associate Prof. of Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt.

4 Demonstrator of Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt.

Abstract

Laboratory-scale digesters were constructed to investigate the effect of digester shape (horizontal and vertical) and substrate type, cattle dung (CD), chicken manure (CM) as mono-digestion and a mixture of them (50% CD+ 50% CM, w/w) as co-digestion on quantity and quality of biogas produced. The experimental work was carried out at 20±3 ºC (winter season), 29±3 ºC (summer season) and 38±1 ºC (heating treatment) through digestion period of 60 days.
The results showed that, the highest value methane 68.1% (by volume) was obtained from the vertical digester of fed with CD+CM at summer temperature. On the contrary, the lowest value of methane 42.0% was obtained in the horizontal digesters fed with CM alone under heating temperature. The highest value of specific methane production rate of 238 L kg-1VS added per day was obtained from the horizontal digesters fed with CD+CM at summer temperature, while the lowest rate of  32 L kg-1VS added per day was observed in the horizontal digesters fed with CM alone under heating temperature.

Main Subjects


Abdel-Hadi, M. A. (2008): A simple apparatus for biogas quality determination. Misr J. Agric. Eng., 25(3): 1055-1066.
         Angelidaki, I. and Ahring, B. K. (1993): Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 38(4): 560-564.
AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 15thEdition, Washington, DC., USA.
APHA, American Public Health Association (1997): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed., Washington, DC.
Bardiya, N. and Gaur, A. C. (1997): Effects of carbon and nitrogen ratio on rice straw biomethanation. J. of Rural Energy, 4(1-4): 1-16.
Black, C. A.; Evans, D. O.; Ensminger, L. E.; White, J. L.; Clark, F. C. and Dineuer (1965): Methods of soil analysis. II-chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
FAO, Food and Agriculture organization (1997): A System Approach to Biogas Technology: (from Biogas Technology: A training manual for extension) (FAO/CMS, 1996), Sustainable Development Department (SD dimensions), SD: Environment: Energy and Environ. Technol., posted June 1997.
FAO, Food and Agriculture organization (2001): Production yearbook, Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
GTZ, Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (1999): Biogas Digest: (Volume II. Biogas - Application and Product Development) GTZ-GATE. Eschborn, Germany.
Güngör-Demirci, G. and Demirer, G. N. (2004): Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol., 93: 109-117.
Hartmann, H.; Angelidaki, I. and Ahring, B. K. (2000): Increase of anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter in full-scale biogas plants by mechanical maceration. Water Sci. Technol., 41: 145-153.
Lusk, P. (1999): Latest Progress in Anaerobic Digestion. BioCycle Magazine, Volume 40, Number 7, USA.
Nielsen, H. B. (2006): Control Parameters for Understanding and Preventing Process Imbalances in Biogas Plants: Emphasis on VFA Dynamics. Ph.D. dissertation, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Salminen, E. A. and Rintala, J. A. (2002a): Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste–a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 13-26.
Salminen, E. A. and Rintala, J. A. (2002b): Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid poultry slaughterhouse waste: effect of hydraulic retention time and loading, Water Res., 36: 3175-3182.
Sanchez, E.; Borja, R.; Weiland, P.; Travieso, L. and MartIn, A. (2000): Effect of temperature and pH on the kinetics of methane production, organic nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the batch anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioprocess Engineering, 22: 247-252.
Tafdrup, S. (1995): Viable energy production and waste recycling from anaerobic digestion of manure and other biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy, 9(1-5): 303-314.
Weiland, P. (2000): Anaerobic waste digestion in Germany–Status and recent developments. Biodegradation, 11: 415–421.
Zennaki, B. Z.; Zadi, A.; Lamini, H.; Aubinear, M. and Boulif, M. (1996): Methane Fermentation of cattle manure: effects of HRT, temperature and substrate concentration. Tropicultural 14(4): 134-140.